wow are you really equating rape with robbing money? And oh """"rape"""" is just a "super hot button", because actually it's not worse than robbing money...yeah, right..

I was thinking the same reading the comments here, it seems that when it comes to sex everyone forgets about feminism. Already the language...do men "get to bang" us? um whatever

women (I) do that too.

no way...! a**holes!

A case of appropriate user name.

i'll check in 24h for you

you're golden :)

I do that too though not with bowling. It's indeed a really good indicator of how deeply a guy believes in equality - there is the ambitious "I like to win" and then there are the "I dont like to lose against a woman" type, for instance. The "wow what a talented woman, she wins over me" is potential boyfriend material.

It's nice how a woman can be totally shallow and yet will be idolized since she fits into some supposed "beauty ideal"

Agreed that many probably do not believe the accusations, though I think the "not believing" part is deep rooted in misogyny where a womans voice does not count as much as a mens and where women are just gold diggers after wealthy men. So how much better it is I don't know since I am not sure if this attitude is not…

Idk. I think comedy can have a point without bashing the already oppressed but bashing oppression. Exactly in the "nagging wife" example I don't see any particular truth but bias: It's like the saying that women talk more than men and all the jokes around it, when in fact numerous studies have shown that the reverse…

calm down. I didn't mean you. I meant that a guy like him would hold much less destructive power if society would not support him. How did you ever made a personal attack out of that...?

from a medical/neuroscience standpoint there is none. They all belong to the category of the "Anti Social Personality Disorder" (historically there might have been a different school of thought behind each term, but it is not clear if empirically a distinction would be possible, probably not).

ok he is senile. but what about the audience? how do you excuse them for applauding?

I can imagine - just a theory - that they put people in the audiency who would start the applause. And most people feel very uncomfortable not joining in in an applause. No justification, just the explanation of (stupid) peoples behavior.

I dont understand the weenie tweet. Someone bother to explain? Scientific curiosity

If people would do things just "because they are more practical", that means if people would be more rational, we would have basically a perfectly equal world. So I don't think that men take on the same amount of responsibility just "because it is practical" but that there is always a bunch of beliefs behind it. That…

sorry, what BS. I am pretty sure that people who have not experienced racism can understand the concept of anti-racism, exactly because of thinking that people of different skin tone should be treated equally while recognizing that this has historically not been the case. You are just repeating the same old "humanist…

audio book ;) ;)

isnt that a bit generalizing? I think there are plenty of different characters in this category. I'm just defending since I know genuinely old-fashioned but good guys who do mind objectification and the like. But I can also imagine what type of men you are talking about, probably the ones who are as sexist as…