As I pointed out before. You're severely deluded. You've somehow gone from climate change denial which is completely accurate, has nothing to do with holocaust denial (in fact it would make it less reasonable), and is in contradiction to the scientific consensus to racism?

Wow, so you admit tyranny is illegitimate concentrated power. Yet somehow feel illegitimately concentrating power in the hands of only white land-owning men is not tyranny?

You realize denier denotes negativity. Framing it as denying denial doesn’t work. Figures you are a loon that doesn’t believe in climate change and thinks the holocaust was made up. Go figure. You’re the one that needs to stop lying. To yourself and to others. Shouldn't you support Hillary? I mean you are both massive…

Oh, if only you realized how racist that was.

Nice strawman. Progressives aren't saying people don't or can't disagree. They are saying that people are wrong. Now tell me one group who says that those that disagree with them are correct. The reality is "small government" and "free market" concepts have been demonstrated to be failures. Also, the fact that…

By all means post a quote from one of these sites illustrating how it supports your argument. lmao

I’m thinking you just really strongly believe throwing out the word extreme means something. To begin with yes our system was highly tyrannical until very recently. A majority of our citizenship could not even vote.

You’re right. There isn’t room to debate. You’re wrong as I illustrated multiple times. The arguments you’ve put forth have to be some of the more absurd I’ve ever seen. lmao

Yeah, you're 100% wrong which is why I did.

More falsehoods eh? Here is a quote from Sanders himself on that vote. I also hope you aren’t a Clinton supporter because then you have no leg to stand on speaking about someone’s voting record. We’ll just say he “evolved”.

Aw, that’s cute. You think you have a point by taking my statements and twisting them to make a false argument. Aren’t you precious.

No, the system is not designed to reduce extremism. In fact, the original reason for not having direct democracy was because they only wanted white landowners to be represented. You legitimately think that gerrymandering districts to maintain control so that you can continue to gerrymander districts is not tyranny.…

So basically you're an idiot. You understand the consensus on climate change yet want to be pretentious and act as though you can attribute false additions to that consensus. I also love that you continually post links that have zero bearing on anything you are actually saying. You are a very bad troll.

How about you don’t bother responding then? You’ve already illustrated you know nothing about Sanders. You falsely claimed he was a climate change denier when he is the exact opposite. You keep stating he is wrong on everything yet strangely can’t come up with one single example of a platform he has that you consider…

Sorry to inform you, but the only insufferable one is you. You claim to support Sanders and I’ll take your word for that though I have my doubts. If so you would officially be the first Sanders supporter I’ve seen that does nothing but spout vitriol and at other Sanders supporters no less. Absolutely pathetic. You…

And fyi you don't get things done by playing hardball. You get them done by working together and by inspiring voters to vote for like-minded Congressman and local politicians. The only one generating that enthusiasm is Sanders.

Your point is wrong. Sanders has been working for civil rights since the movement began. Clinton on the other hand has not and has actively done things that worked against minorities. Claiming Clinton has cared about minorities longer is false. Claiming she is better capable of getting things accomplished is also…

My point is that you are taking it the wrong way. Not sure why you are going out of your way to be offended. By that token it’s far from minorities. Sanders supporters, myself included, call any Clinton supporter ignorant. The reasoning is based off the fact that they refuse to acknowledge any criticism of her. They…

You’ve seen and lived through and taken part in more presidential elections. That’s more relevant than being part of the demographic you claim won't vote? Sure.

By all means please point out an example of these policies that don’t speak to day-to-day realities. Then illustrate another candidate with a superior policy that does.