Again the only patronizing attitude is yours toward “privileged white liberals”. I love that you assume we are all privileged as well.

Pick one? How about you try doing that? Considering you obviously know nothing about any of his positions. lmao

How do you know now? I’m not saying its a perfect idea. How about you try proposing one? Because I assure you partisan districting that allows for one party to maintain a majority with less overall votes is not it. That’s tyranny of the minority.

Yeah, your age is massively relevant.

You can leave it in the garbage where it belongs. A biased article mischaracterizing a bunch of cherry-picked tweets is meaningless to say the least. FFS

Funny how no one has actually done that and you've yet to point out anything specific. The only person doing any of the things you mention is still you.

Again, that is how the Senate works. Also, I meant proportionately assigning the number of representatives to each party in the House based on the percentage of popular vote in the state instead of drawing district lines.

Oh, you mean like how you've referred to me as a child and a kid and pointed out that I must be younger which are all entirely irrelevant to the argument and in in no way indicative of whether my point is valid. Basically the very definition of ad hominem. A term I seem to understand vastly better than you do.

Wrong again. No, democratic socialism is not what the USSR called its system. And I still don't see a single example of you illustrating an area where he was wrong.

How racist of you.

What sentiments would those be? The ones you falsely attribute to his supporters or should I say the “white” ones. And he has had no issue incorporating criminal justice and racial justice into his platform. That’s one of his strongpoints.

Sanders has a much better record on civil rights than Clinton or Hillary. Both of whom supported policies that negatively affected them. Like the failed “war on drugs”. So try again.

Perhaps you missed the fact that I was pointing out legitimate criticism is not “sneering”. You sound like a Clinton supporter. They always accuse any criticism of her as being "bashing" or "attacking".

What is his “biggest obstacle” then? It isn’t being unelectable or too far left. It’s 100% simply an issue of publicity.

“Of course, his rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change doesn’t work in his favour either.”

Here is a challenge. Point me to one article stating “Bernie is surging!”.

Your ignorant trolling doesn’t change facts. Clinton is unelectable. Sanders is the most electable of any candidate. And that’s according to those beloved media polls that show her leading in the primary.

I'm glad you at least provided an "example" this time, but still haven't said anything. Sanders solutions are not only correct, but the only ones that will work. Every proposal he has outlined are wonderful and progressive. Try stating an actual argument next time instead of throwing around childish insults and ad…

No, that’s how ad hominem works.

Actually, the vote counts show Gore should have won and was in fact cheated. Its not at all a conspiracy theory.