Sanders is wrong how exactly?

Interesting considering that minorities like the BLM movement asked him to come up with a criminal justice platform that basically mirrors their own. Coming up with solutions is what all the candidates are expected to do.

Don't underestimate the progressive movement.

You do realize Obama was facing Clinton and is more analogous to Sanders right?

Actually, popular support is by definition delegates. Every indication is that he will win both Iowa and New Hampshire.

They keep it by gerrymandering the heck out of districts and suppressing votes.

So you mean like our political system in the US which was designed that way. I want our system to work the way it was intended. Gerrymandering destroys the notion of representative government. A state by state popular vote system might actually be more effective.

So you're older and that somehow lends more validity to your invalid argument? Just because young voters and progressive voters tend to be apathetic doesn't mean a historically progressive candidate won't get them to the polls. Also, Obama led Clinton by more at this point and look how that turned out. And again as…

Or Obama.

It shouldn't be that unnerving since you've made it abundantly clear you sought out to "hate" them in the first place. The only vitriol I've seen is coming from you. I'd love for you to explain how Sanders supporters are "brogressive" yet you claim the candidate they support is not.

Interesting since the ones that forget those promises are generally the "moderates" like Clinton not true progressives. We haven't even had one in office for a long time. The closest was Obama and he was still pretty centrist. There is no "distrust" about Sanders. In fact, he is the only honest candidate that is truly…

To begin with anyone that is insufficiently progressive could absolutely be “sneered” as insufficiently progressive. Also, her “credibility” is non-existent. Most people understand she’d be a terrible leader and is entirely untrustworthy. The reality is she is just a bigger name than Sanders which means early polling…

Technically correct is the worst kind of correct to be. Technically, both parties are to blame for the inaction in Congress, but realistically one is moreso than the other. Sanders is more progressive and truly Democratic than Clinton can ever hope to pretend to be.

Of the United States.

Then Iowa will really kill her.

You'd be wrong then. Don't rely on polls for an accurate reflection of how actual votes will go.

Not a chance. It's more likely that Sanders takes the nomination and takes both NH and Iowa.

Less polling, more media bias. Notice the myth perpetuated by the media that Sanders is not a legitimate threat for the nomination and is unelectable in the general. Notice how often it gets repeated in polls and comments. Just have to keep correcting people that the opposite is actually true.

Interesting since Sanders has a strong chance of taking the nomination. As far as complacency Clinton is already expecting to win so that is a given. What's more interesting is that Clinton has no legitimate chance of winning the general while Sanders does. Yet the corporate media keep trying to perpetuate the myth…

With so much political experience you don't seem to have much perspective. Clinton led Obama by more and lost. Sanders' biggest issue is name recognition which will only increase. Don't count your chickens.