Exactly. All signs point to him winning Iowa, but not according to their polls. Same thing happened with Obama.

Bernie has been slowly gaining in the polls since the beginning and that will only continue with more debates and as primaries get closer. Polls at this point are meaningless.

It's not. I saw a poll showing around 14% of Democrats will not support Clinton period.

What makes you say that? Just because inaccurate polls are excluding them doesn't mean Sanders supporters won't show up to vote for him.

Gerrymandering districts is perfectly fine so long as your party is doing it. Democrats receive more than a million votes more nationally yet have a minority in the House. It is also used to pass bills in districts by rearranging who is voting for them. It is not something that should be political period.

Look homie, if you feel your specious strawman arguments have bearing then by all means continue. Not all minorities vote against their best interest just as not all whites do. The only one that’s painting with broad brushes is you. Regardless of how someone frames it the fact doesn’t change. Many do seem to vote…

It's not a messaging problem. It's the fact that they reduced the number of debates down to 6 and placed them at times when no one would be watching. The fact that there is almost a media blackout on Sanders compared to the other candidates. It was a concerted effort on the part of the DNC. Hopefully this changes as…

Obviously for you it isn’t. Since you keep stereotyping “white” people repeatedly. All people in America identify more with race than class. In reality class is the more prominent issue, but here we focus more on race. It’s the reason certain people fight to see minorities prevented from seeing social benefits, but it…

Funny because the white folks lining up at Trump and Carson rallies are not the ones you keep referring to. Also, they were included in the original comment as voters that support candidates who don't support their best interests. The primary group that usually applies to is white Republicans that are not wealthy.

A better, more relevant comparison would be Obama.

Least competitive? You're probably right. At this point Clinton stands no chance. Based on historical primaries she was leading Obama by more at this point.

He'll do even better work as a president.

Says the random person on the internet disagreeing about what “is best” for said group and stereotyping “white people” as a whole blaming them for “this mess”. A group of people you are most likely not a member of.

Therein lies the problem. Why exactly is it that you think he has a 1/100 chance? That’s completely absurd. Every factor says otherwise. His higher electability versus Clinton. Record crowds, record donations. Wide range of supporters with grassroots organizations giving him their endorsement and support. Literally…