Actually, its not. That particular malaise afflicts everyone. Its only the ones on the right who think they can levy it as some sort of criticism against the left. Generally those on the left are more educated and do more research I agree. That does tend to lead to a feeling that someone who disagrees, who is less…

Except its not in any way more "regressive" than the US model though you do love framing it that way. They are not only highly taxed, but also highly regulated as well. Hence why the model even works. They also have socialized college and healthcare. You're a very strange person. The entirety of your arguments on all…

Talking about the issue that mattered most to people in the key decision moment. How is that not Sanders exactly? Don’t forget the records he is breaking are Obama’s. Sanders polls as the most electable of any candidate. Which means he is actually more electable than that because the polls underestimate his actual…

He’s not the one that’s got it wrong.

I meant an article from an actual mainstream media outlet. What the heck is njtoday?

Yeah, he could be if you accept that there is no actual certainty to any of the polls period. Figure it out.

No, what you call “reality” is just meaningless polls as I’ve pointed out numerous times. As the article itself tried to indicate. The reality is his support is far greater than any polls are showing and once he starts to get more coverage as he wins early states his support will only grow.

Sorry, dumbfuck I got so bored by your long-winded idiocy. You’re correct in that the only vote Clinton has on the subject she chose to be on the wrong side of it. You’re also correct that Sanders did support closing Guantanamo, but voted against bills that did not address the humanitarian concerns alongside most…

Careful or you'll get called an arrogant douchebag too.

You mean the word you used that I quoted from you?

No, I didn’t post any meme. Still not sure what you are blathering about with the holocaust bs. Yes, the projections from the IPCC are massively higher than RCP 2.6 and yes you need to learn to read the very graph you posted. Also, you might try reading your own links which consistently disprove everything you post.…

No, that is not the Scandinavian model nor do billionaires support it.

Thanks for tell me what I posted and didn’t post moron. No, I’ve posted no memes. And my capitalization means absolutely squat regarding the HoLOcauSt.

Except as I said repeatedly they aren't "douchebags with overinflated egos". That just a mischaracterization by actual douchebags with actual overinflated egos.

You type so much shit, but you say nothing of relevance.

Interesting considering I never posted any meme at all. Why you keep harping on holocaust denial is beyond me.

That’s actually not a false equivalency at all. In fact, it would go the opposite of your argument. Note how you left out my other remarks as well. Bye Felicia.

So now we can see the blatant hypocrisy in labeling anyone as condescending or patronizing can’t we. lmao

Is Martin O’Malley polling better against Clinton than Obama did? Is he winning some states in the polls? Is he setting records for crowd size and individual donations? Is he polling as the most electable candidate from either party?

Here is some math for you. How was Obama doing at this point in the primary against Clinton? Sanders is closer. How accurate historically are poll results at this point in the election (as this article itself points out)?