Yeah. She lost. Why so surprised? Never underestimate the power of the jaded and privileged. Viva Canada!
Yeah. She lost. Why so surprised? Never underestimate the power of the jaded and privileged. Viva Canada!
Yes, why not reinvent another game feature that currently works just fine? The constant reminders that this game has no way of reaching its ever loftier goals has left me in a fowl mood.
charge her backwards, even. fucking ridiculous.
Damn, son. I gave you too much credit. You only got a few sentences in!?
Ok. Fair enough. If I missed the point, what do you call it when someone reads an article titled Accept Random Events where the author clearly says:
Don’t skip the second to last paragraph! Accepting that some things are out of your control does NOT mean GIVING UP CONTROL. You don’t have ultimate control. None of us do. We never did. We never will. Identify what you CAN control and take thoughtful, respectful measures to exact the changes you want to see.
HEY! Look down here for a sec.
Exactly. In the face of yet another display of systemic racism that got an INNOCENT man KILLED, it is incredibly ignorant, not at all helpful, and extremely disrespectful to play I-Spy-Other-Social-Injustices. YOU DON’T. Not in this case. Shelby is getting LESS scrutiny than she deserves, not more. Should men be held…
I.... I suppose I might be. But if you would elaborate a little, we can discuss and make sure. What sort crazy thing did I say?
Thank you for clarifying. I’m not going to take offense at you insinuating I am ignorant in “intersectionality 101" or “critical race theory” mostly because I think you’re being facetious and those aren’t actually college courses. If they really are, they honestly sound very interesting. Also, what is a JFC? [None of…
Whoa, sorry sars. Never did I intend to say that somehow it’s cool if we ignore black women’s rights until after we settle black men’s rights.
Bussy26 There is a possibility that the only reason this officer was singled out as having been one of the “few who needs extra scrutiny because female” is because she is a female.
A black woman’s life does not deserve more concern than a black man’s life. They are different kinds of humans, sure. But neither of them have more stake on living than the other.
I’m really glad you mentioned that. I’ve had some recent convos on this subject right here in jezebel. “Females are less aggressive” That right there could get you into some interesting debates. To some that sounds like assigning personality traits to a gender. And that is incredibly rude of yo...... wait. Sry we were…
You’re not wrong to say this smells funny, but there is no way to separate this into one part “serious racial discrimination” and one part “less so, but still serious gender discrimination” without reducing the former. Let’s not reduce this. Not one bit.
Wow, either XBox Live has come a long way since Halo 4 or you sir, are on Playstation Network.
As a man who has sex with women, I would be happy to have sex in any of their crawl spaces.
Maybe save the eye rolling and vitriol for someone more deserving.
Same here. I don’t think anyone is implying that those traits can not or should not exist in women. I believe it is ok to say that most women posses a certain trait and most men posses another. Would it be bad for a woman to embrace those traits because some people will automatically assume them?
I think this is a beautiful sentiment. The idea that finding balance between two opposites is how you find harmony, this is not a new idea. Why does it sound so crazy to you?