It's not an insult. It's just a little known fact that The Count, when confronted with extremely large numbers, panics and forgets how to count higher than 3.

What are they going to do for Poison Ivy now? She already was just wearing a crotch pasty.

"Fine, I don't really care what you catagorize it as. Paul isn't an anarchist, and therefore Owen made an mistake and just can't admit it. "

World War Z is a documentary about the war with zombies after the war has ended. It is not unfilmable or even requiring leaps of ingenuity to convert to a visual medium. It needs talking heads. It needs fake recreations and fake new footage. It does not need a plot. It does not need a leading man.

Yes it totally for real is. Libertarianism is a very wide umbrella describing a lot of political philosophies that to varying degrees eschew government in favor of personal liberty. Anarchism is one of them. Anarchism doesn't mean chaos. It very basically means no government. It's the natural, furthest position one…

Anarchism is a form of Libertarianism.

Give it to me straight into my veins!

"Confirm the possibility" is up there as one of the weirdest turns of phrase I've encountered.

If this is really about EA not wanting Steam to distribute DLC and Valve requiring DLC be available along side games they offer, then it doesn't sound like Valve is the one limiting how developers interact with customers. Only having EA dlc available through one retailer is what is limiting, at least from my side of…

Maybe Bioware is making their next ground breaking advancement a protagonist character who isn't attractive looking and is completely unlikable. Nobody's ever done that before... on purpose.

*slow clap animated gif*

A faux hawk? A faux hawk, really? A faux hawk? A faux hawk, Bioware? You're going with a faux hawk? A faux hawk?

The FCC is already out of the way of having control over internet providers. Internet Providers are already not being regulated. Things are already being left to the free market to work out. This is what happened.

It occurs to me that I should point out, I ask this because this work looks better than the other project that is already doing Vice City.

Can you do Vice City next? That's still my favorite GTA.

"I don't need to prove that because we all know it." No. You do need to prove it, because nearly all attempts to prove that gut feeling have found thinking with guts not particularly accurate. Use the correct tool for the job.

I completely agree with the ruling that the law violates the first amendment, but I still make the same kind of statement all the time, as do many people in the same position. Kids should not be able to buy anything their parents don't want them to buy. Violence, nudity, communist manifestos, Rebecca Black albums...…

Yes. What he disagrees with is the supreme court's stance on pornography.

That statement doesn't suggest Stewart think's it should be illegal either. He just thinks kids shouldn't be able to buy it. That's the near unanimous stance of everyone on either side. He also says he knows it's free speech.

He was making fun of the inconsistency between protecting violence as free speech and not sex. That's a perfectly fair criticism and he makes no suggestion that depictions of violence should be regulated.