Everyone understands that the....and it pains me to say this... “writers”....at Gizmodo and former Gawker affiliated sites are stewing in their bitterness over Gawker’s demise, but it’s time to let it go. It’s time to come to terms with the fact that Gawker brought on it’s end by being an intellectual cesspool that…

By other posts, do you mean the close to 200 posts calling out Trotter for his absurd demand that Altman resign? If so, then yes I’ve read them, and no there isn’t any subtext.

“I, Sarah Litsa Press, would like to officially announce that I have just cut ties with YCombinator.”

“Instead of arguing this abstract idea about not being fired because of politics, let’s just reflect on this moment.”

Wait, Trotter actually studied journalism?

“journalists”

“The choice before Altman is not a complicated one, though. He can continue to lead Y Combinator with Thiel as a part-time partner, thereby giving Thiel, and thus Trump, the imprimatur of the company’s reputation. He can ask Thiel to resign. Or he can resign from Y Combinator.”

Yes, Trump is a disgrace, but Clinton is equally so....we are damned if we do, damned if we don’t.

Oh, so we should ban law abiding citizens owning firearms on the off chance that a criminal might steal them? Do you have any figures on how many criminals steal legally purchased firearms, then commit crimes with them?

In other words people who are currently in or have graduated from a US college within the last 10 yrs.

And yet, a naked Trump statue is a completely acceptable form of free speech and political/social commentary. The hypocrisy is real.

More specifically, that’s progressive America in a nutshell.

That’s some quality snark right there, sir.

“Shouldn’t driving a manual be a prerequisite for the leader of the free world, anyway?”

“If the differing theory is grossly at odds with reality then yes, they’re a conspiracy theorist and not a very bright one either.”

I suppose we would have to check in with saintandrew to see if discussing Foster is also off limits. Open disscussion isn’t really posible if one side gets to determine what is an isn’t a valid topic, now is it? Then again, I get the impression you really don’t care about having open discussion so much as you care…

*Sigh*

I already gave you my explanation. You evidently consider it to be about as valid as I do yours. I never said that your explanation is impossible (now you’re putting words in my mouth), however I do consider it to be implausible. Would you care to provide any evidence ,other than Hillary’s own word, that would support…

Unfortunately, anything “crazy good” on Fox gets cancelled within the first two seasons.

“Arbitrary criteria”