plissken77
Plissken77
plissken77

No, the US media is here to enlighten the unwashed masses, to bring them out of the darkness with the “truth” and “reason” that they vomit onto the airwaves, internet, and newsprint everyday.

I’m not a lawyer, so I’m not entirely sure how zoning laws come into play in this particular situation, however the county doesn’t seem to have any problem with the structure or the way it is currently being used. One thing I do know, is that if there was a problem with the zoning, the bureaucrats in that county would

Yes, it would have. One could also argue that it would be nice if a someone that actually produces works of literature had won. 

The same could be said of Hillary Clinton, however you don’t see the press in the US calling for her to be burned at the stake like they do Trump.

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.” - Inigo Montoya

Let’s be honest, orange would probably look better on Hillary than it does on trump. 

Again, you make statements without expanding upon them. Why do you think it is “absurd”? Why do you think I’m simply “guessing”? What exactly is your point of view on this matter, because you haven’t offered up a single counter point, you haven’t bother to clearly define where you stand on this issue, and you haven’t

And what happens if the accuser goes to the school first and whatever committee oversees these matters decides that it’s not worth pursuing disciplinary action? Can you tell me with 100% certainty that this won’t taint any criminal investigation, that law enforcement won’t take the accusation less seriously if the

Really? Care to expand upon that or are we simply supposed to take your opinion as fact? You’ve been making statements in response to my posts, but you aren’t providing any reasoning or explanation for your stance. 

“but that one treatment in 2011 left him with a paralyzed vocal cord that robbed him of his voice and prevented him from doing his job effectively.”

Never claimed that I did, Do you? Contrary to the current trend on college campuses and the narrative being pushed by progressives, accusation does not equal guilt. This may be difficult for you to comprehend, however in the US one is innocent until proven guilty and whether you like it or not the accused has the

Are you talking about someone who has been convicted of sexual harassment or someone who has been accused of sexual harassment, because the two are very different.

*Sigh*

“bad trolling, do better. this is just a weak and stupid argument.”

“if you’re talking about 1 in a million false accusations compared to the thousands of rapes on campuses across north america each year, i think it’s an acceptable risk that occasionally 1 in a million falsely accused dudes might get kicked out of school and have to transfer somewhere else”

“you know you guys who come on here to argue about how frequently men are falsely accused of rape are creepy, right? like, you do get that about yourselves?”

No, they are forming tribunals that are determining guilt based on accusations. Rape is a criminal act, assault is a criminal act. Guilt should be determined in a court of law where both the accuser and accused have the legal right to give their testimony before a jury of their peers. The current climate on college

Never try and counter someone with an argument that can be thrown right back in your face. The Clinton name has been synonymous with lies, deception, ethically questionable and criminal behavior for decades and yet the media in the US is all to happy t0 divert attention from this. I’m not saying that we should ignore

“Many Americans have been asking these questions during the past year as Donald Trump has taken political dishonesty to new and disturbing heights.”

Last time I checked rape was a crime punishable by jail time, it’s a matter for the criminal court, not a civil court.