It’s not a gender issue, it’s your implication that to be given something requirements a repayment of some kind (“She was given a free pass...she is in debt”). Sometimes people simply owe others nothing and that’s okay.
It’s not a gender issue, it’s your implication that to be given something requirements a repayment of some kind (“She was given a free pass...she is in debt”). Sometimes people simply owe others nothing and that’s okay.
Tell me your thoughts on a debt owed by a woman for taking her out to dinner.
I’ve been living in Dallas for the past ~10 months and it seems that the people that most need to get safety inspections are:
See also: USA
They said “regular gypsum is much less harmful...”
“probably one of the most successful items in the Tesla Shop.”
Given the damage, the Tesla must have been going pretty fast as well, yeah?
Here’s an entire Jalopnik section dedicated to car crashes of all kinds, but of course that completely refutes your statement above so you’ll either ignore it or move goalposts.
I’ve been in Dallas, TX for about 7-8 months (and thankfully only a few more to go) and the roads & highways around here are absolutely dreadful. Outside of traffic (which is constant), the roadways are warped, potholed, surprisingly winding, full of debris, shockingly wide in total breadth but with narrow lanes, and…
So one can have too many to keep track of, but your example is stating the location of every single one (of which there are many) of those are not even owned by you? Did you mean to defeat your own point?
“Flags on poles like they should be using” lmao.
I had to scroll pretty far down to see this discussion...and that’s a little distressing.
Just rented a Polestar 2 in Hershey, PA through Avis (same company as Budget) and the rental agreement states verbatim: “Your vehicle is currently fully charged, but you are welcome to return it at any state of charge as long as it is not empty. If the vehicle is run to 0% charge or less there will be a flat fee of…
Kind of a bummer that this is the settlement. Yes, consumers were negatively impacted by misleading marketing, but the company knows that this is much more of a preferable resolution than actually changing the way their cups are designed/manufactured, being on the hook for developing recycling solutions, or being made…
If the consumer purchases that package.
When (or maybe if) this truck is officially in production, what’s the over/under on the base price being ~$100k USD?
Kinda how I felt too - they avoided a lot of risks in this one, but part of that probably has to do with this being a multimillion dollar one-of-a-kind car (I think on Hoonigan they said that this is the most expensive car they’ve ever had built & they weren’t given the final number). Additionally, Las Vegas…
You’re missing the point. “Safe” is non-binary & consumer desires can be nuanced (e.g. asking specifically for things that may now be considered “normal”). You’re the main character in your life only - people are going to have different knowledge, approaches, desires, wants, values, etc than you.
Right, we’re talking about insurance policies needing to be updated to keep capital flowing when there’s a very real threat of nuclear weapons being used. Idk, maybe I’m jaded.
You’ve got some things to work through, my friend. They pulled the plug on their ID.4 purchase because the price went up by $7500 due to regulatory change, but you’re caught up in this marketing campaign stuff. Yes, sucks that the dealer now has to move this car off their lot, but that’s part of the game.