@Slinkytech: More like someone saying "there's money in Banks. Here are banks that have the most money. " And when you look at the list of banks that have the most money you say "oh... I knew that already."

Let me get this straight; the problem is not that the American Public knows of the list of critical infrastructure sites. We already knew about them. ("The Strait of Hormuz is a choke point for Middle East Oil Exports!? The heck you say!")

@EatMeatOrDie: I admit it, I went on a bit of a lazy Sunday/Midday rant. But I always thought Boston was a cool city.

@JonThomasDesigns: I would have guessed "RMV", "MBTA", "Colleges and Universities".

I would have guessed Arizona Iced Tea before Arizona State University.

Wake me up when it gets wired directly to his brain and acts as a third eye. Right now it's just a piercing.

Lightening strikes the earth about 8.6 million times a day.

@Bavarian_Horseplay: No No.... you've got it all wrong. The video screen on her visor is the DVD player (and she gets props for NOT staring at a DVD while reversing down her driveway). The backup camera is displayed on the rear window at 50% transparency. That way she can look out her window and look at the camera…

People hit things. Technology is not infallible nor does it make people infallible.

@Kaiser-Machead v.2.4: Insects, spiders, trees, grasses, fine cheeses... A lot of that stuff wouldn't survive marine inundation.

@Fossa: Whole new meaning to System Crash.

@Go Vols!: Again, I'll give you time sensitive (i.e. negotiations with North Korea or such). But any responsible government should know that nothing reliably stays secret for long. And that at every step you'll have an informed public demanding transparency and accountability.

@Go Vols!: At best I'll concede that there is time sensitive information that need not be made public immediately. But that should be the rare exception.

@bigmil87: John Q. Public does not react. It is led. The only things we are "better off not knowing" are things we are told we are "better off not knowing" by a voice with an agenda. And in that case, it doesn't matter if information is leaked by Wikileaks or made public by Janet Napolitano.

@Go Vols!: As citizens we have to demand that.

@Go Vols!: Your argument did have merit to it, right up until that last sentence.

@Gary_7vn: To be fair, Sarah Palin did think he was moose.

But didn't Obama promise us Transparency in government?

@Gravity: The greater danger to our nation would be taking down sites like Wikileaks.

@Zubieta: Depends on who participates I suppose.