I knew that my instant reply would have already been made by someone else, I just needed to make sure it was soon after the article was posted.
I knew that my instant reply would have already been made by someone else, I just needed to make sure it was soon after the article was posted.
The first sentence of this said exactly how I felt in the first seconds of this episode. I think they actually made us watch him get shot twice this episode?
I really thought the breakfast scene was gonna include some mention of how that would not feed her enough at all.
Apparently this show makes me act like a mom concerned my baby isn't eating enough.
I'd hope that it means the opposite for the Defenders as they rushed IF for it so we'll assume they had a reason.
I really would like it to be something that would be super illogical to take place in Seattle just as a fuck you to the world.
I sort of actually like this season in terms of them taking chances with individual episodes, like this or the prison one or the jackson episode. We've gotten MUCH better patients with great guest actors and generally better medical plotlines for it (last season truly was horrible with patients being forgotten halfway…
I keep hearing that but the theme doesn't have any emotional effect with how they shove it in with generic 'be nice!' attitudes.
POOR MANS AMY ACKER
Think Waltmobile is right in saying they tried to sell it to us every season.
I don't really understand how everyone is now just convinced that the end game will be Rafael, tv show logic dictates it in but seriously it won't be happening anytime soon so just let it be.
And most likely with Mike Tyson too. Ashley wouldn't hold back.
Yeah, we need to know population density and other surrounding factors to even say if it is an anomaly, AND they don't even specify if they've all got a specific form of cancer that more likely results from air or water pollution.
I get it, why you can empathise with Maggie this episode is why I could with the ones before - because I could see myself responding the same in similar situations. (yay for emotional immaturity!)
I don't buy it because (on top of what you mention) much like with Rowan and Jake it required the character disappearing for 2 episodes from the plot before suddenly becoming relevant just when the plot required another person we sorta-should care about.
I defended Maggie in the comments here last week but this week she did make the worst choices in every step. It's worse because before this, she made her valid choices while people kept secrets, so in context her actions were acceptable.
I think you're right that the problem was that this literally wasn't something her mom would do or ever allow Maggie to do. But it was covered in all of these snide comments about Double D's which made Maggie inexcusable and was literally shaming her mom for supposedly caring about 'materialistic' things.
Imagine: the GOT spinoff turns out to be a (Arya/Puss in Boots type) Ser Pounce animation series, wielding his tiny sword for vengeance.
I don't understand these comments at all. There are endless books with a single lead. But when they use a different medium such as television, you cannot have 100plus episodes that mostly focus on the lead.
Exactly! And that love for the source material or even just understanding why and what your audience wants from a certain show means we're more willing to wait while they figure things out. It doesn't solve the problems, but makes us give you a chance.
How can you misread the initial article AND my explanation? It's NOT about the company! It's about wanting to be Iron Fist.