I don't think you read the article.

"you cannot change the psychology underpinning society"

Probably more than twice as well, depending on your metric.

You'll know they're lithium because they cost 4x as much.

Is this...fate?

And thus a hacker was born.

Don't underestimate the transformative power of the triangle button.

Bye.

Every game ever detects my hardware as "Low." It's a laptop, and I suspect that games see the first video card they come across, which in my case is onboard Intel graphics Which totally ignoring the discrete graphics card.

Sometimes a man comes to a point in his life where he just has to Clockwork Orange that shit.

If MSI was smart, they'd sell this grey-market and make way, way more cash.

He was almost certainly an asset, even if his games didn't directly draw in tons of cash for Sony.

Companion kills sometimes count toward player kills, unfortunately.

If L4D3 took this tone and setting, I would actually be really excited.

Reiterating and confirming that GPL is not the same as public domain.

Gordon Freeman is supermodel hot and everybody fawns over him and that's Valve projecting? You reveal yourself to be a troll.

Then give me evidence. I'm not opposed to the idea that the ESA study is wrong. I just have a higher standard of evidence than somebody on the internet asserting something.

""There were [review scores] towards the high and things towards the low, but the middle just didn't get any traction. It's pretty obvious that people were using it in some ways to kind of use it as a soapbox or whatever"

I really, really wanted this to be a Doctor Who/Duke Nukem crossover.

Two of the three games you mentioned as being worse also had lower Metacritic scores, if that makes you feel any better.