It's not an IQ range. "Retarded" is a term that can be applied to lots of different things, but it always means "to be slow or delayed in growth" or "to be slow or delayed in development". That's why the medical use of the term for people with disabilities that affect their learning was specifically termed as "mental…

Yeah. Also there are times when you're led to believe Alyx has been captured or killed, and it turns out she saved herself.

I accept that presentation is important, but sometimes it can't be compromised. After all, if she moderated her vocabulary to avoid big words, how big is too big? It could be nothing more than a race to the bottom, with more care taken not to upset someone's fragile sense of overeducation than to adequately articulate…

Tiny list, and games with a choice of gender don't really count as games that involve marketing female characters. Also, read this: http://penny-arcade.com/report/editorial-article/games-with-female-heroes-dont-sell-because-publishers-dont-support-them They really don't get the same budgets. Not even close.

Oh and by the way, there was no Arkham City bit. Either that either person pulled it from their arse, or it's from some other video. You didn't know that, therefore I doubt you watched the video enough to make that assessment about a lack of research.

What you see is obnoxious, patronising, and her saying "I'm smarter than you"? I don't see it at all. It sounds like pure projection.

You're absolutely right, I was reading a reply to someone who'd replied to you, and didn't notice it was someone else. My apologies.

What misinformation? It was true. I've just got to the end myself. She even says: "I'm not saying that all games that use the Damsel in Distress are automatically sexist or have no value". She is simply arguing that this cultural factors contribute to a society that sees women as lesser beings than men.

I had a feeling you clicked to the end so you could mention Arkham City and look like you've watched it. It's extremely well researched. That's one thing you absolutely cannot fault. If you don't appreciate the argument, fine, take it on. But she's not lazy, she's not lacking knowledge, and she's certainly not a moron.

Make that video then, you tit.

This is part 1. She might well come back to the other ways Catwoman is portrayed poorly in that game, but that wasn't within the brackets of what Part 1 is about.

Yeah, caring about the medium you also love, striving to improve it and drag into into the future. How dare she? Being all knowledgeable and intelligent like that. Makes you sick.

Oh I see, there's more to it (I've never used Minecraft). From the Youtube video's About:

Those links in the article are what you need, I think!

You're fighting against a limited number of enemies for the precise reason that there are solid limits, and current consoles choke when trying to provide too many models. They don't have the spare capacity to work on physics. That capacity might not seem to be important right now — you might hear about the trash…

"More strangely, God of War II was released on PS2 several months into the PS3's existence. Back then, in early 2007, it served as a sign that artistry, confident art direction and satisfying gameplay mechanics did not need cutting-edge hardware. Sound familiar?"

You're so utterly ignorant and incapable of comprehension, I'm surprised you got so close to forming two complete sentences. Third time lucky!

I'm glad they're barely operating in my country. I can't really blame people for taking the bait, but I too wish people would just ignore them. They behave as if they're an undercover front for the meat industry, to ensure that all animal rights concerns look stupid.

I think people went a bit overboard (waka waka) with their praise of the naval combat, since it was pretty limited if you stepped back and looked at what you were really doing, but the dev interviews this time are promising. You can leave the wheel and swing over to a victim ship, and take it down yourself in…