Ouch, right in the childhood.

Wow, if sex with women isn't even enjoyable, then men who are constantly trying to get 'laid' are even more pathetic then I thought.

I like a man with a big duck...or chicken...any farm bird is good.

...it's not nearly big enough to have sex with...I suppose you could use it as a dildo.

Who would this product have been for? No one would have bought it for their children to play with and it's not the sort of thing that would have become a valuable collectors item over time so...why?

Really? All feelings look like that? Weird.

Throughout all of history men were given more opportunities than women, anyone with "eyeballs" can see that. Or do you think the fact that women weren't allowed to attend colleges until relatively recently wasn't holding them back at all?

The fact that you're bringing things like this up in the comments section of a post about random celebrity twitter accounts isn't doing much to prove you're not a troll. The fact that you believe the things you're saying doesn't make you not a troll.

Yep and we're all lesbians and if we see a woman walking down the street wearing make-up, we throw rocks at her.

"pass" on what? Did she propose to you or something?

Those details were included because they were actual parts of the case, the writer didn't make them up.

It just means that they know she claimed to have a personality disorder but they don't know which one. It's the appropriate word for the situation. How does using the word 'unspecified' make her look better or shift blame off of her? Would it have made you feel better if they'd been able to specify a personality…

Holy crap, do the paparazzi actually have drones now?

No, he was involved and did not deserve to information about his involvement withheld. It mentioned that she claimed mental illness because she did and it didn't work. Those things actually happened. You're basically calling the writer of the article 'biased' for not selectively leaving out information.

Where's that quote from? It doesn't say it anywhere in the article.

I'm guessing those details were mentioned because her lawyer used them as part of her defense. Those are not unusual sorts of things for an article about a criminal case to mention and even if they're true they don't excuse her behavior.

I'm guessing because her lawyer used that as part of her defense. That's not an unusual thing for an article about a criminal case to mention.

There's a denim on denim trend? Didn't we already do this in the 70's? and then again in the 90's?

Now, this just makes me question rather or not men can be CEOs at all. Clearly their natural nurturing instincts get in the way of professional achievement.

Why did you have to remind me about that god awful Catwoman movie? Biggest wasted opportunity EVER.