obvioushuh16
obvioushuh16
obvioushuh16

Does it really matter?

Yep. Fuck this article.

One time I was changing in front of an open window and I was like, "Should I close the blinds? Nah. What are the odds that someone is going to walk by that exact window at that exact minute and look up? Plus I don't really care if some random person sees my boobs." And then, guess who walks by and looks up at that

My office is across the street from a hotel, and I've seen nekkid people in their hotel rooms a number of times without trying. It might be good for people to realize that if the windows aren't covered, they aren't hidden from public view, even if they are 26 floors up.

My mom, who has worked as an RN in substance abuse treatment for 40 years, has always said regarding substance abuse and mental health issues, "women go to treatment, men go to jail."

How does she make the men look silly? She looks foolish mimicking others, but I fail to see how the men being mimicked look silly.

You can harass them back, but what you described is assault.

They do this all the time, if they don't like the outcome it's all "Too small sample size so doesn't mean anything" or "research done by just men/company so doesn't mean anything" but if it confirms their own ideals it's suddenly hard science.

Oh, her husband has become the Hey It's That Guy of minor cable networks: FX, TV Land, TBS, etc. I am sure he is busier than her, at least.

I confess, I don't have a ton of sympathy for what essentially boils down to "it's not that simple because a bunch of grown women act like hypersensitive children".

You know why it's different? Because if I were asked to go to three different showers, buy a tux and go to a destintion bachelor party I, and every single one of the groom's friends, would tell the groom to go fuck himself.

I would love an explanation on why you consistently delete comments that are critical of you. No other writer on Gawker does this to the extent you do and it comes off as incredibly unprofessional. I have noticed a minimum of four on this post alone. Censoring people who are using inappropriate language or vulgar

This really doesn't matter. People who were going to vote for her are still going to vote for her because it suits their agenda. In the end, she was just doing her job as a lawyer. When has doing your job right ever not conflicted with your morals or something you held as a belief?

No, she's bitching about a situation as though women have some added burden in terms of dressing for the workplace. They don't.

NEWSFLASH: there are vastly more rules for men in terms of work-appropriate attire, especially if you're a lawyer. Dark suit, leather shoes, very short hair.

One thing that doesn't get mentioned is that his "pervy" behaviour at work was in the context of being surrounded by women who were fucking their way up the ladder. If you work anywhere "hip" or "cool" or even just "high status", you regularly get emails from women who apply with sexual offers and breast measurements

The accusers' texts and emails and pictures sent to Charney were revealed. One of the accusers was repeatedly asking Dov Charney for work opportunities while saying things like "I bought a fat dildo...". It was a case of unethical gold diggers mining a rich guy for money. The woman was consistently texting and

i feel bad for that guy. unlike terry richardson, his accusers genuinely were full of shit

Dogs that show "repeated unprovoked aggressive action" need to be put down. Sorry. Aggressive dogs like that cannot be ethically adopted out-they can be dangerous to everyone around them. I cannot think of a single humane society or shelter that would take a dog with that sort of behavioral history.

And: "About 400 military dogs are retired from service yearly; 430 military dogs were adopted in 2011. There is usually a waiting list of about 300 to 400 potential adoptive owners...Contrary to popular belief, the military no longer euthanizes an animal simply because it cannot find a home for it. The only