nullplacement
Null
nullplacement

We need to see the completion of the critically underrated Darksiders series! Someone finance this and let the same people continue working on it!

Guns are tools. Gun control, like the so-called "War on Terror," is a facade that presents a false sense of security. Gun control restricts law-abiding, legal-gun owning citizens while doing virtually nothing to stop illegal gun ownership and criminal use.

These game companies continue to perpetuate practices that are both bad for the consumer *and* bad for the producer. Companies stand to make more money from imports, and yet console companies continue ignorantly to fight this. While some consoles have been region-free, this is not a general policy change across the

It is my humble opinion that EA is overly credited for its role in the video game industry. In the absence of EA, not only will other avenues/companies rise up, but they most likely would even benefit the consumer to a greater degree. EA has a history of pushing developers to release products based purely on attempts

I'm assuming since it runs an unhindered version of Android, games should not need to be custom-made specifically for the Ouya? Shouldn't it run all Android apps and games as long as it meets the proper hardware requirements? Correct me if I'm wrong, please.

Title says "last game," article is about a game add-on.

You are sadly misguided if you think only gay people can speak on matters concerning gays, and nothing I say can change your mind.

As a police officer, as soon as I saw that photo all I could think of was a parking citation for "Encroaching on a handicap space."

A side note, and I will leave my comment at this (no response), but "homophobe" makes no sense. The Associated Press is heavily discouraging the use of "homophobe" and "homophobia" because it is not a reasonable or sensible term — it's a nonsense term. "Homo" means "same," and "phobe" means intense fear, a phobia.

As many have stated, this "Gaymer" convention is completely unnecessary, and, dare I say it, counter-productive.

Very, very well said. Agreed 100%.

Someone help me understand why humanity was even MORE violent for the rest of human history long before media existed? Why was so much blood shed by both armies and average people, and so much violence in pubs and other locations, so common before photos, moving images, and video games existed?

Nothing is better than the Japanese car: That's

This is an absurdly stupid article.

Your point #1: Yes, it does. It is not fully equipped to handle a full-scale invasion/war. They also have a great navy.

Obviously Japan was a foreign invader of China. China has an army, of course.

I'm well aware of these issues, and appreciate you mentioning them.

This is video game news that's important. Remember the huge video game political debate in the 1990's? We need to be careful, because we could soon become like Australia, where certain games are banned. We need to continue to fight so that we can enjoy our games without ignorant political trash getting in the way

There's no reason Japan should not have its own military. A country is not a "beacon of peace" when it simply uses the military might of another country by proxy (the US). Every peaceful country that refuses military action benefits from the militaries of other countries defending it by proxy. This is not pacifism,

You stated that I "sound like an...." Sounds can be deceiving. Anyway, end of conversation with faceless nobody. You may have the last word if you wish doesn't matter, neither of us care what the other says or thinks. Just speaking truth. That's how I am, I get confused for being angry and vengeful because I speak the