notyourstolove
notyourstolove
notyourstolove

Eh, I'm not being passive aggressive. I'm merely pointing out that this conversation does not warrant the personal hostility that you are bringing to the situation. I have not attacked you once, yet you've called me "passive aggressive," implied I'm stupid and told me to go away. It seems that the low blows are on

I have not attacked you or been hostile toward you and yet you keep resorting to sarcasm and personal attack - it's odd and I wonder what's going on in your life right now that you feel the need to resort to such negativity. I'm sorry for whatever it is.

I'm not against people talking about themselves, this just seems to be more about the writer than the issue. And it's an important issue to discuss - especially for a "ladymag blog". Realistically, what are our options for raising children? I'm curious. What actually is the best way to raise a 2 yr old without making

Wow. This article seems to be riddled with the writer's "baggage".

I felt that was a little unnecessary and unproductive. This is a pretty serious issue, and I think it deserves some legitimate examination rather than an opportunity to take a swipe at men.

I think that there is something here about the harm that's done to people in impoverished and stressful environments as children. I recently read an article in the atlantic about the brain changes that occur when children are exposed to stressful, impoverished situations. I am hoping that this science begins to point

I like this opinion as it's an interesting take: Why do we always want to start from these places? We see a terrible act of human gargoyleness, and we want to confirm that this is in our DNA. Maybe it is, but maybe it's also like carrying genes for certain disease: Whether or not it's ever activated depends on whether

Yeah, agreed. Sometimes the "edginess" here is just misdirected.

I'd prefer if you did not make assumptions about my life, as we are not acquainted. However, even though Kate is being used a symbol here to illustrate the pitfalls of the fashion world, I think that what becomes the subject is "Kate Bosworth is not worthy of our adoration" not "The fashion world needs to expand it's

How you treat other people is about you, not about them. Even if someone appears to "deserve" something it's your choice to engage with them in a positive, solutions-based way. This isn't on Kate, no matter who she is. The vitriol in this article is on Dodai.

Dodai led the "let's shit on Amanda Bynes" parade before Amanda was diagnosed. So, I don't feel this is uncharacteristic.

I'm not certain what purpose tearing down one person serves - isn't all of the this shit the product of a corrupt entertainment and fashion "system" which has multiple issues and multiple people involved?

I don't understand what we're accomplishing in this space by attacking this one person. I agree with your issues with the system, and would love an article about that. This seems too "mean girl" for me. Can't we discuss the issues without attacking someone we don't know?

AGREED.

Exactly.

Agreed - I think we should start a hashtag: #solidarityisforwhiteaffluentmentallyhealthystraightwomen

I did not mean to imply that you should do something different in your personal life. I appreciate your struggle. I have a brother and a mother with schizophrenia. I feel that they would be more inclined to take their meds, and be able to face their illness better, if they did not have to face daily jokes, looks and

I think it's very funny the way this publication treats mental disorders in general. It seems that you go to all of these lengths to prove that any mental disorder you, the writer, may be accused of is considered "normal". Re: Depression, PMDD, OCD, etc. However, this same publication writes scathing and cruel

I think it's very funny the way this publication treats mental disorders in general. It seems that you go to all of these lengths to prove that any mental disorder you, the writer, may be accused of is considered "normal". Re: Depression, PMDD, OCD, etc. However, this same publication writes scathing and cruel

I think it's very funny the way this publication treats mental disorders in general. It seems that you go to all of these lengths to prove that any mental disorder you, the writer, may be accused of is considered "normal". Re: Depression, PMDD, OCD, etc. However, this same publication writes scathing and cruel