Respectfully, barf.

That’s the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. If that was the case how do you explain This Is Us? Nobody is trying to censor anything touchy feely.  Men are the ones who are much more open about how much they love sex.

I didn’t realize the 2k20 in the title was the expiration date.

Hi,

Eh, I kinda just expected a little more from kotaku, reading the room doesn’t seem too hard at this point 

Gamers: *rise up*

Maybe now isn’t the best time to be supporting blizzard for a product that’s virtually the same as another product but with a fresh coat of paint and an even fresher coat of bowing to the Chinese overlords.

“ProJared also quietly moves past the fact the kid states he passed his GCSEs (which would’ve happened during that time frame PJ described) which are largely a rote memory exercise at times having done them myself. So if this kid had no memory, how would he be capable of studying for, sitting, and passing exams?”

nope, but you love to follow and participate as part of the mindless mob of the internet rage machine. spin on cog, spin on.

you literally ignore ALL the evidence?! such as the message that been published that CLEARLY shows him asking the accuser’s age BEFORE allowing them to send anything?! doesn’t sound indiscriminate to me. as for behaving like him, i can already tell you that much isnt true. not that i will have to prove it since your…

What would you do? Trying to defend yourself on Twitter? Good luck.

“Something Something power imbalance! Something Something HE’S GUILTY NO MATTER WHAT.” That’s Kotaku’s basic stance on anything. There’s only an imbalance of power if you let there be one. If you put yourself at a disadvantage, don’t be surprised when someone takes advantage of you.

No, the evidence he presented does.

“Guilty even if proven innocent." Classy.

So you think the marriage issues that never should have been anyone's business and a consenting adult doing adult things with other consenting adults were the bulk of the shittiness, not the falsely accused pedophilia? That says more about you than him.

“Wannabe rockstar”? So your take is that he just wasn’t famous ENOUGH to be a consenting adult doing adult things with other consenting adults. Cool.

funny how when he is under suspicion and not defending himself we see a HUGE article about it, then when he defends himself with evidence after having consulted lawyers, all we get is a paragraph. no bias there at all....

Well at the very least I’m going to look at both sides, their Twitter and videos, then come to a conclusion myself. These bandwagons everyone treads are too frightening in the “join us or die” mentality.

Real thorough article, I especially like the part where you’re very clearly biased and have literally no desire to mention the list of links he provides to back up his claims

I’m fully prepared to either stay in the grays or get a million people slamming me (or both!) but here goes. When the controversy first flared up I was fully on board with cancelling him. Everything I read or watched made him seem like a monster. But out of curiosity I watched his video when it popped a few days ago…