notbilloreilly
(Not That) Bill O'Reilly
notbilloreilly

You accidentally omitted an “n” there Raffi

It’s not restricted to the GOP—Clinton administration had quite a few Goldman folks, and NJ politics is rife with them despite its Democratic dominance.

Goldman is trading at ~$232 right now. That’s a lot of professional protests just to get into a meeting where everyone will take a nap while you speak.

That’s me blowing off activists collecting signatures around Farragut Square every damn morning. I’m not torn up over the fact I don’t give a shit about your organization, I just have somewhere to be.

No actual Goldman Sachs employees had anything to say for themselves at all. 

Right? “Hey I screamed horrible things at these people. Why can’t they try to engage me in a reasonable conversation?”

No more or less complicated than the DNC’s newfound discovery that it was a Russian front all along.

What’s at stake here will likely be boiled down by Washington football fans as a matter of free speech. That’s not the case. The Patent and Trademark Office’s restriction on disparaging terms falls under the guise of “government speech,” which is held to a different standard than regular free speech allowances.

Because it has a lot of embedded brand value, and even to the extent is would be improved, it is nonetheless a bargaining chip that he needs to keep in his pocket for the next stadium deal.

Because they’re waiting until the DC Council decides to pay them to change the name in exchange for a shiny new stadium.

Only if the Dems can reclaim the Senate first, since we all know Reid’s filibuster-but-only-for-SCOTUS sham isn’t going to survive its first test.

Off by a round.

Every time there’s a Washington recap, the butthurt fans whine about penalties. The Caps had 3 power plays to the Pens’ 1.

That doesn’t excuse the gratuitous whacks he took at the pads while lying prone on the ice. Getting knocked into the crease isn’t a free pass.

That entire thread is magnificent.

Not just the Dodgers logo . . .

Volume 4 in the collected editions (not sure if it was really cleanly divided into seasons in its production run) coincides with the show’s move from Fox to WB and a change in art style to fit into the same world as Superman the Animated Series.

I have a very hard time countenancing any argument that shows like Superman, Batman Beyond, or Justice League—which each owed their existence, tone, and content to Batman: the Animated Series to varying degrees—were meaningfully better than the original.

So for 3 of the 7 sins, your argument is that the screenwriting failed the character it developed, rather than added additional wrinkles to his character? How many more sins need to deviate from the “rules” you took away from the plot before we can safely agree they aren’t “rules” at all?