Explore our other sites
  • kotaku
  • quartz
  • theroot
  • theinventory
    nonnald01
    don
    nonnald01

    vertical screens are great for a lot of things, but what always bugged me was the uneven visual line that the top of the three (in this case) monitors make. A perfect setup would be to have 2 horizontal monitors stacked and then whatever size they worked out to be, get 2 appropriately sized monitor that when

    our vision may be more horizontal than vertical, but most webpages, have a lot of wasted white space on either side. Take a look at the comparison from the new york times vertical vs horizontal

    they need one for its vs it’s. First paragraph got you

    these are the same people that make those powerpoint presentations - you know the ones. A new dissolve transition for each slide - wipe up, wipe down, block dissolve, clock rotate dissolve. Don’t forget the clip art and stock images of teamwork, motivation and the sales revenue upward trend arrow chart. Then enter the

    the secret for tastier ANYTHING: add salt

    I hate when services flatten out your folder structure. I had some pictures I was printing at one of those in-store kiosks for a collage frame that had various size openings. I was smart and cropped them all to the proper ratio and then put them in 4x6, 5x7, 8x10 folders, but just left the file names as they were

    a very considerate one

    no - it was borked yesterday for a lot of people (including me) too

    any cordless gaming mice? I can deal with a wired keyboard if I absolutely have to, but I refuse to fight with a mouse cord like it’s 1995

    Are we sure about this board-foot formula? It’s odd that it uses mixed units. It has us measuring width and thickness in inches, but length in feet and then dividing everything by 12. If we divide the length by 12 we’ll get the length in inches, but why are we dividing the width and thickness by 12 as well? Maybe I’m

    what’s really needed for archiving is something that we don’t have to worry about read endurance. I would make huge sacrifices in write endurance/performance if it meant that I wouldn’t have to worry about not being able to read it at any point down the line.

    I understand you’re just illustrating a timeline with the interface technology paragraph, but just in case there a few people that don’t know. SATA 1, SATA 2, SATA 3 is just a speed difference. All the drives have the same connector and a SATA drive of any speed will work fine on any motherboard no matter whether it

    you always hear the “don’t go grocery shopping when you’re hungry” advice, and I agree with that. On the flip side of that - don’t go grocery shopping after you’ve just had a big pig out meal. I’ve done that and end up not getting hardly anything and I have to make another trip much sooner than I planned

    wow, that’s awesome stuff. I did get a 35mm f1.8 prime that I’ve been using and I really like it, so that’s helped some. 1/500 is pretty quick. I’ll have to try that out even if I have to bump up the ISO

    lol I did. Yeah, the 3300 is what I got

    January 2014. Very similar to the 3200 from what I remember reading. They removed the Optical Low-pass filter upped the max ISO from 6,400 to 12,800 and it comes with a collapsible kit lens (which I thought would be nice, but it’s an annoyance).

    it looks like the graphic was made at about 3200 ISO. Either that or it was blown up from a thumbnail

    OMG that is so awesome. What a great way to practice. I got myself a Nikon D33000 for Christmas and it’s my first jump from the point and shoot cameras. My main project is trying to get pictures of my twin 14 month old nieces while they’re running around inside a dimly-lit house (why make it simple right?)

    keep in mind that if something goes wrong with the Canon EOS 70d you only have the warranty offered by the seller. Canon USA won't service products from other countries (even if you pay them)

    keep in mind that if something goes wrong with the Canon EOS 70d you only have the warranty offered by the seller.

    that's awesome. I've always thought that microwaves should have something like this built-in. Punch in the time and the wattage from the instructions and then microwave would adjust the cooking time accordingly based on its own wattage