Well, as they said in the article, it can melt a full ton of copper on contact. So there's that. OTOH, the chances of you accidentally finding your self in the path of the beam is less than zil, so, I'm going with not very. But extremely would also be a valid interpretation.

I'm trying.

You know, you can just admit when you're wrong. There is nothing wrong with saying that you were being close minded and that it is only a monumentally difficult problem, not an impossible one.

I never called you a shit stain. You need to read more carefully! There's an 'if' there.

Its sooo hard sometimes, lol. You just want to let loose.

There, there, child I know the world can be confusing at times. But go here:

To do what you're proposing, One would have to stimulate a great deal of specific neurons simultaneously. This is something that could never be done with magnetism. That isn't pessimism that's basic physics.

In VR, however, vergence and accommodation no longer integrate seamlessly. The screen of a typical head-mounted display sits three inches or so in front of your eyes. A set of lenses bends the light, so the image on the screen looks about one to three meters away. However, any objects further or closer than that can…

It would suck to be the deckhand that has to clean the holodeck.

People don't punch me in the face because I'm not rude. That mentality seems to working very well for me so far! I'm not saying not to retaliate. I'm saying that when you do retaliate, do it with politeness, poise, and class.

Also, Spiderman.

The occupation does not determine the respect, the actions and behavior of that person do.

Your choice. If you choose not to rise above these shit stains and be better than them, well then you're a shit stain too, I guess. Your choice.

How rude! Everyone should be treated with the respect, use either 'sir' or 'madam'. Yes, even if they are card carrying members of the sheet wearing racist klan.

Someone with a brain.

That isn't 'screwing themselves'. Instead of spending the resources to polish and iron out a useless product that no one will ever use, they see if there is any interest to actually use the product, then when it proves itself, they polish it.

Neither of these people are in the right here: the lady shouldn't have been parked in the left lane or filming while driving ( that's what dash cams are for), and the brodozer guy shouldn't have been tailgating or flipping her off.

That's ageist. We should be testing everyone every couple of years.

Except Canadians died.

I'm having a hard time figuring out Microsoft's strategy. It looks like they're taking any key app and feature that sets Windows Phone apart and making them available on competing platforms. I can appreciate that they're taking a gamble on trojan horse marketing; trying to generate some good will by making good apps…