They had two season talking up their future "Year of Hell". It turned out to be a single 2-part episode that ended up being wiped from the timeline.

If Garak isn't on your list of best characters in DS9, I don't know what show you were watching, but it wasn't DS9.

Except she had a superweapon against them. She could have just given that weapon to everyone but the borg.

He screwed up. All. The. Time. I just finished rewatching the series. My wife would be blurting "God damn it harry! Again?" almost every other episode.

Yeah, but one of those two kinda sucks.

Graphic full of confusing numbers provides sensationalist headline rejected by morons.

I'm going to second the idea that it could have a lot to do with the foods you are eating. Fats and fibers will keep you feeling full for longer. MFP also keeps track of your fat, carb, protein, salt and other macro and micro nutrient intake. Check out if you are loading up or missing out on something.

It is that easy. Go look at the some ads for the diet industry. "Lose weight while eating whatever you want!" Or, "Check out this one weird trick that destroys fat."

There's a chance no one dies. There's a chance the wii player dies. All it takes is one cop who thinks 'that's a gun' and things don't look very good for that gamer. But if three cops burst into the room, you are at least three times more likely to have at least one cop think 'that's a gun'.

alt-tabbing out of the game and surfing the web doesn't seem very professional to me.

An officer on each side of the door with another 2-4 officers as back up 10 feet away is enough to handle one gunman without cops 'inevitably' being shot.

It's dangerous. Guns are involved. There is nothing that is not dangerous about this. There is absolutely no argument you can possibly make that will not somehow alter the fact that this is a dangerous 'prank.'

Wow. I say that this response is too much and you've gone skin the way to a world without police at all.

As compared to going in guns blazing.... right.

Ridiculous. So it shouldn't be assault with a deadly weapon if I were to just kindof point my car in your general direction and POSSIBLY run you over as I take my hands off the steering column?

Dude. You should bring that strawman to the next Burning Man. Just because I think that the situation doesn't justify a full militarized response, doesn't mean I think they should be walking up casually.

When they enter the address it pops up on the screen?

Yup. Him along with everyone who has ever hired a hitman. I think we can all see these are different.

Honestly? The gulf between 'ignore it' and 'a fully militarized response' is so large and obvious I'm having a hard time not believing you are a troll.

Well sure. But knowing that someone else will overreact, and being responsible for their overreaction are two different things.