The buggers didn't consider him a war criminal. At the end of the day they told him they understood and didn't blame him.

Ridiculously over-complicated is the literal opposite of genius and precise...

The problem with gentrification is that the poor doesn't have any capital. If the people renting the broken down apartments got paid when they got pushed out of their homes, it would be a whole other story.

I know that with certain geometries/trajectories travelling faster than the speed of light will cause time travel. I have zero understanding of how that is true.

Which part? You said "Numerous studies have demonstrated that both sides of the political spectrum are well-read and well-educated."

Citation?

And it isn't just 3rd party apps. Microsoft didn't even come up with all the basic apps need to run your computer as a tablet. Where's the Metro control panel? There isn't one. Where's the Metro file explorer? There isn't one.

Didn't EQ2 only come out a good while after EQ1 stopped being the biggest thing ever? It makes sense to do a numbered sequel after the first one more or less dies. But WOW is still going on strong.

First I should point out that you probably didn't mean "eukaryotes". You probably meant "flagella". Eukaryotes can be rather complex, and in fact, flagella are an individual component of some eukaryotes.

The real shame is that we don't have one that doesn't take damage when a heat source is tested.

No, that's false. It has been shown the the parts break down and are functional at different levels.

Yes buthe said that we should point them at the cops, not the protesters.

Let me give you a glass of each let's see what you say then.

It isn't what "this article claims". It is what has been shown in numerous studies over many years all testing the experts who claim to know their wines.

When he knew what winery it came from, what years he was picking from, and what notes to look out for in each vintage, he still only got it about right 1/3 of the time. And he claims that he did better than the others.

No. Not "usually that is by the ignorant who don't know much about wine themselves". Did you not read the article or are you just ignoring it because you don't like the facts it represents?

He didn't explain anything. He came up with a hypothetical. And he was wrong about it. They don't put everyone in the same room. There is no way that they can influence each other.

Yes, it does. If I give you a cheeseburger and tell you it is chocolate ice cream, and you go on about how great the chocolate ice cream is, how it taste like it is from the chocolate growing region on the hills of Ethiopia, and how it taste like the chocolate was aged at least two weeks but definitely no more than 3…

If expected perceptions completely overrides actual perceptions - "the human brain can over-exaggerate those differences or fool itself entirely" as you put it - then yeah it is all in your head.

They don't do the experiments with everyone in the same room. There isn't any way for one tester to influence the others.