nightobeisance
nightobeisance
nightobeisance

I don't usually agree with violent tendencies, perhaps because I have a few of my own, but this is just so right. The German perfects it.

"I'm just more concerned for the point at which someone's activity on the internet, or their virtual personas, affects their daily life. "

There are exceptions for public spaces as well. At least here in Canada. Wise to get a release? Sure. Required? No.

Way to betray a complete lack of understanding of BDSM. If you see it as the entertainment of sleezeballs you've no understanding of consent. The entirety of every session is discussed, limits noted; discussions even occur around what word means "no" in the context of play. There's more discussion and preparation, and

All true. The definition of "public body" was made broad enough in FOIPPA to include health care agencies, grade schools, most post-secondary education, and many other areas, including public pools. In most cases, it doesn't mean that a picture can't be taken at all, but that there are controls over how and when.

Define hurting someone. Any person, confronted with an "intimate" photo of themselves, can be hurt by that presentation. Their trust may be violated (students in these examples) or their person (up the skirt shots) but it's still a violation of the person. Hell, a telephoto shot of a family picnic-ing in a park that

Ruling out People Of Wal-Mart would be a damn good thing.

Both truisms, if you'll allow some modification.

I'd add that the teacher has a duty of care to those students. He's sure as hell not exercising that duty in posting pictures of them to the internet. Not even if they were portraits - not without parental consent.

Some great humour in these threads, thanks for the chuckles, all!

Buy a shirt with the full rainbow on it instead of the one with only six shades. LGBT folk will know the difference and leave you alone to deal with the 'phobes around you.

I dunno, Vin Diesel's earned a rep in the hollywood rumour mill, and he pretty near always drives American muscle.

I'll leave "most gays act effeminate" for the moment as it's simply a faulty assumption, and simply say that you can't add. Your two and two is a million-plus, apparently.

Great illogic, as you surely intended. If LGBT+ folk possessed no sense of humour we wouldn't have Lebanese like Ellen or be willing to discuss which cars are the most gay.

Actually, it's the colour for anti-bullying, girls (after WWII, anyway) and many, many other things. Some light, easy reading for the ignorant: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pink

Those don't mean you're gay, they mean you have shitty taste in car colour!

Uh, my landlady's husband recently picked up a 2005 V6 convertible with no decs for $600 bucks. He'll drive it for the summer and then sell it off for a thousand. He wants the wind in what's left of his hair, not an uptown image.

Oi! Not all gay accountants wear that awful scent, listen to brit-brit or cher, or buy the lowest-rung 3 series!

Well now, you could simply learn how to polite inquire and/or suggest corrections. Seems you're a fair ways from beginning to master that skill.

That'd be a Lada, then. Niva 4x4, 4-speed.