Certain? No. Reasonable supposition based on the article? Yes.

And bad journalism excuses the reader from applying any cognitive skills.

So quoting CVS' blurbs is Gawker smugness?

Pricks and BMW's do seem to go hand in hand.

I thought it likely the case, but as I say, the association is there. I can't hear that song without thinking "fucking ungrateful USanians - we landed all those gd planes and this is what you popularize? we should burn your white house again."

I'll never watch it. I rarely see movies in theatres (the sound of cell phones is too distracting) so it was on my list for viewing whenever, and I still hadn't seen it when 9/11 came about.

You're not alone.

Yeah, the objectification felt really, really bland. By the end, it was 3rd on my list, maybe 4th.

The only thing in touch with the young in this track is autotune.

I was thinking "this is all pretty bland. Song, lyrics, visuals. Meh, nothing to get upset over. Liking sex - butts - doesn't make you a freak." Had no objection at all (I can work with objectification when it's so unsubtle in purpose) until I got to Pitbull(face) saying "and on to the next."

That is fucking beautiful. And expresses this Canadian's sentiment perfectly.

A "dear head"? Ouch. His poor wife.

Something had to happen outside of Florida sometime.

This. They have money to hide it more effectively. That is all.

Only if you add sterility drugs as well. Time for there to be a mean intelligence test before reproduction is permitted.

This. We grew up with just a couple of horses on the farm. One was a work horse, the other a retired show horse. That ****** dumped nearly everyone who tried to get on his back, and was smart (evil) enough to aim for the old trough, or the nearest wet horse-patty. My grandfather used to get a kick out of watching folk…

Holy crap.

I'm a mean person. This is funny.

I love getting Dick's on Broadway!

The value you're speaking of already exists in the government subsidies and supports going inappropriately to the company's net income.