DWB?

Wow. How many two-year-olds can get involved in a simple speeding ticket?

Trust apparently can be quite damaging.

No right or wrong in this video? There is indeed. It's all on the rider, initially for his differential speed, swerving around traffic, and then increasing his speed without checking visible obstructions. At best, he's a lucky idiot this time.

Whole-heartedly agreed.

If you need someone to fly to hawaii or sydney (or the like), do get in touch.

$1,400 is indeed a lot of money for baggage; as at least one other commenter has noted (haven't read 'em all yet...) he likely could have shipped it more cheaply by another method. Try ground shipping maybe?

Instead his actions have caused Travis Okulski to misuse "hero". A hero is "a man of distinguished courage or…

This takes me back a far greater number of years than I care to admit: I was a newcomer to four wheels and a powerful right foot, cruising along a busy main street at night with my cousin and another kid in the car, when I saw a flash of light in the rearview.

I usually just say "Canadian" in a firm but not loud voice. It's enough for me.

Where the profits of any company end up is impossible to tell from the headquarters or historical founding location of a company. Instead, it requires examination of the company's transactions and finance strategy to determine what they're…

Actually, if you read my response you'll find I didn't ignore your points at all. I agreed about not calling the man himself disgusting, that folk are free to choose for themselves regarding a boycott, and that each person is free to spend their funds as they deem fitting.

I'd call the attitude disgusting, myself - not the man - though I might argue that his behaviours are a matter of choice where that's less so of the LGBT+ community.

Apologies, I spoke to your comment regarding behaviours only obliquely.

Ah, would that Trek (whichever generation you prefer) was indeed our reality. It would still be a flawed reality, but might be an improvement.

I'm puzzled that one might think of a boycott as a high aggression response, so perhaps you'd clarify what kinds of actions you're speaking of when you apply the phrase. The…

The argument can easily be made that OSC, through his association and support of NOM is directly injuring people through enactment of laws restricting freedoms that many people take for granted. It's not simply a voiced opinion. (Here in Canada, even some of his speech might be actionable as a hate crime - it depends…

A boycott has little to do with moral superiority, no matter who has started the process. It is, rather, always about shunning an organization or individual for their expressed views or actions.

I find myself wondering if you've ever rented the hotel room for your womanizing friend's trysts. Your tolerance of his practice doesn't require that action from you, I believe.

Wow. Read this article for a history. OSC's actions go far beyond a simple opinion.

http://www.salon.com/2013/05/07/sci…

Tolerating a spoken opinion (within the confines of constitution or charter) is necessary for free speech to exist. However, to suggest a responsibility to support the individual beyond that basic right (by buying the product or service) is patently ridiculous.

Yes, hazards.

We share the Jalop bit, though you'd never know it by the appliance I currently drive. I've no doubt many will favourite your original comment. In my opinion, some of them will do so only because of the tone of the content, not a reasoned examination of the circumstances that you've so obviously done, evidenced by…