just use the move sharpshooter.

Except you're expecting us to believe you/her while providing zero evidence. And that's not how this country works. You're merely claiming he's guilty and ending it there. And that is morally wrong. I never said anyone was lying. I'm saying you need to back it up more.

i loved him in Suddenly Suzan and Batman

the trouble is he is a complete douchebag

Well when he's not a rapist, yes his opinion matters. We don't know if he is or not, so we don't get to assume he is. If you're not willing to prove he is then legally we must assume he's not. That's the whole innocent until proven guilty thing. And sadly for this crime, no one does that. Google his name, he's already…

"How can I have it backwards? "

perfect would be Terri Hawkes.

There was another guy who posted the actual stats, and it was over 5000 innocent men a year

"Discussion about this piece has turned into an argument about whether Max Temkin has a right defend himself, "

Yes, she has. And this is the wrong article to talk about evidence given she's accepted his guilt without any evidence whatsoever.

I use one really good password as the base password for everything, then I salt it for each site making it unique.

Yes she has. Worse, he did acknowledge the possibility something went wrong. So you're wrong on that too

*you made

Yes she has.

I think it's cause she threw out a life-destroying accusation, and he will suffer for it, and she's providing nothing to back it up or warrant the destruction it will cause.

Yes, that happened in Wreck it Ralph. Remember the wedding?

you can have all my stars

wreck it ralph

you had me till youade the last one racist

you are why we can't have nice things