yours was the first logical defense for her side in the comments and articles themselves

true. But if you want to convince someone you do have to go into some actual detail. You can't just scream rape and demand a boycott like she did

ive never starred a personal insult before, but that guy deserved it

you should go to kotaku. Patricia is right now saying that since only 1% to 8% of rape accusations are false, he must be guilty.

patricia on kotaku said she is 92%-99% sure he's guilty.

perhaps you could go into detail about what happened? Cause she didn't and he did, and from what he said nothing sexual happened

that wasnt actually a reply to his post

she has accused him in the comments

that men accused of rape regardless of guilt must apologize for it or use it as an opportunity to talk about rape, but not to defend themselves.

She can't cause according to her she must use this as an opportunity to open a discussion about punching cats in their faces

She's mad he didn't apologize for the rape he says he didn't do in the first place

"I don't see her trying to pin blame on the guy for rape anywhere."

how do you make a great apology for something you claim not to have done?

that statistic is for ones reported to the police. not a blog

33% of muslims support terrorist actions against civilian targets, guess it's worth considering locking them all up

Only 20%? That's not a majority, so I don't think she'd care

Because she didn't give her consent to him not having sex with her

And as a rape victim, you completely mishandled this, thus making it harder for future rape stories to be seen as having any merit.

Agreed. As a rape victim, I don't come to kotaku to hear about rape.

You apparently don't since you complained he didn't apologize for something he says he didn't do. Why would he? Apologizing is for when you're guilty.