You know I'd never disagree with anything you have to say about the W220 and I wholeheartedly look forward to doing this when I finally acquire my own.

It reminds me of the Cadillac Sixteen concept. And, as with the Sixteen concept, me likey. Me likey a lot.

I'll take "words ending in an a-vowel sound that this car should have been named" for $600.

My family rented a 2013 MKZ 3.7 V6 for a week long trek from North Carolina to Wisconsin and back again and it was appalling. Cheap on the inside, ugly on the outside. The way the lines fall, the car looks like it's melting. The seats had so much support they may have been leather covered rocks and the suspension was…

Rude to the flight crew? You must be kidding.

I've always loved the 456. It's my favorite Ferrari.

What exactly were the parameters here, because I'm pretty sure that should be an SL 600 or 65 AMG insread of the 55.

I just love how these really were the Lexus precursor. And those seats...OH GOD THOSE SEATS! TUFTED VELOUR!!!

It would be really convenient if dealerships could actually accurately represent what options their cars have. Every time I go hunting for S-Classes, the only way to tell if it has distronic is to took for the plastic thing in the grille and the switches next to the gearshift.

Then I must posit that you've never been anywhere near a 1975 Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham with a leather interior and an Astroroof. And any option on that list which has to do with 'performance' is irrelevant because Cadillac and performance never should have been mixed to begin with. That was my original point.

Hmmm, it would seem my point has flown directly over your head. Don't think about it so hard. They've both got 4 doors, a cramped back seat, cheap leather, and about the same available options excluding drivetrains. My point is, what is to make someone buy a CTS over the fully loaded Malibu other than a brand that…

Are you suggesting they aren't peddling rebodied Chevrolets now? Because in that sense, nothing has changed. And Buick is guilty on the same charges. They lost customers and got behind because they couldn't make a LUXURY car to match the Europeans. So they fell behind and tried to play catch up with SPORTS cars. Small…

Now we're talking about REAL Cadillacs. But we have to remember what is so often forgotten, this was from a time when Cadillac was just Cadillac. American, and unapologetically so. They weren't trying to compete with Mercedes because Cadillac meant a kind of boulevard luxury and class that some clunky German car…

Reminds me of when I bought my Continental. Salesman must've been stuck in 1994, because he said I'd love the V6 fuel economy.

All I'm seeing here is another example of Cadillac saying we need to be more like ze germans.

I find that insanely hilarious and horrifically offensive, all at the same time.

Does anybody own one of these? What's getting into the back seat/sitting back there like? I have to imagine it's just...such a damn hassle.

And here I thought that ride height adjustment button was just for big speedbumps!

Vote: AOL Autos (autos.aol.com)

I think the biggest problem with Cadillac is that they HAVE been getting away from their past. Their current modus operandi is to outright deny that Cadillac, as a company, existed before 2007. DeVille, what's that? Fleetwood? Never heard of it. If I wanted a 3-Series, I'd buy a 3-Series. There is no good reason to…