This is what a Cadillac is:

This is rough but, it’s the truth. It’s one thing to be writing about a subject you aren’t an expert in. It’s quite another to write about an incredibly stupid and naive thing you did, and try to tell a readership who for the most part are experts in the subject you’re writing about that it wasn’t stupid or naive.

He…

I have said it before and I will say it again:

Counterpoint: (yes i know it’s nearly Winter)

The land cruiser is a great suggestion, especially if you add some personal touches to it, even just nice all terrain tires in stock size; it says I drive this old car because it is cool, I like it, and I can, not that I have to.

Cadillac DTS.

The 1993-1999 Cadillac Deville - I mean, it was a long, plush luxury sedan with a traditionally expansive hood. RWD would have been highly appropriate, they wouldn't have needed to change anything stylistically. 

I tried to let my 6’3 friend drive my Alfa Spider. He couldn’t get his legs under the steering wheel to reach the pedals. That’s how I knew he was too big for the car.

I think that’s more true for people who know cars. To the untrained eye, even older Jags look expensive.

Part of the plushness is the sidewall, removing tire sidewall ruins the ride.

1993-96 Cadillac Fleetwood, the last of the big RWD Caddies.

Actually, there is ! Displacement plus two turbos ! Try a V12 Benz sometime.

That’s a Camry interior. This is a Corolla.

Only that the image you posted isn’t a Corolla, the newest Corolla actually has a pretty simple interior, similar to the GT-86:

We’re backwards because nobody wants to drive a Lada and live in a hovel?

I got mine back yesterday. I fucking love my car. I don’t know how I could even consider selling it.

It’s Friday. Treat yourself to some real American luxury.

Thank you! My first thought as well. Not sure why this is so far down the list, because it’s super obvious.