n2skylark
AMC/Renauledge
n2skylark
Jul 1
5

Also, the CT4 isn’t “all-new.” It’s a heavy ATS facelift. Read more

May 13
Save

AMC did indeed sell cars new in the UK back in the day. They even had their own subcontractor convert them to RHD in country.

May 13
Save

If you want inefficient, you should see how Aston Martin was building cars well into the 1990s. Engines and bodies would be pushed on carts outside one part of the factory, across a street, in the open, to another part of the factory by hand.

May 13
Save

What amazes me is how wrong they got the ‘70 Grand Prix, but how right that image is when you look at the ‘71 Grand Prix and Bonneville.

Oct 25
1

Yeah, Michigan is constantly in need of massive infrastructure fixes because of the weather. And your area has for too long been sidelined. That sucks for sure. Read more

Oct 25
1

1. Your statement was untrue. Moving the goalposts doesn’t change that. Read more

Oct 25
Save

I’ve said it to you elsewhere, but for the benefit of lurkers, that’s a big NOPE. Read more

Oct 25
1

LOL...right, because 100% of government revenues come solely from people who pay income tax. And no money from anyone who doesn’t pay income tax ever makes it into the treasury.

Oct 25
2

Every car that did better than 18mpg combined survived Cash for Clunkers. They weren’t eligible in the first place.

Oct 25
2

We can actually do all of those things. The Federal budget isn’t $45.4 billion/year. It’s much higher than that. Read more

Oct 17
Save

Yup. And the Rogue is built in Tennessee.

Oct 17
1

1) The Versa and Megane are in 2 different size classes and are architecturally unrelated to each other. Read more

Sep 13 2019
Save

Structurally, they changed nothing. The roof, doors and apertures, floorpan, suspension, pillars, bulkheads, etc. are all carried over. It’s got new front and rear sheetmetal and door skins.Cars get new engines and transmissions in the course of their model runs, too. That doesn’t make them all-new models. Read more

Sep 13 2019
Save

As others have noted, the 300M was the sporty version of the 2nd generation LH cars. It was originally supposed to be the 2nd generation Eagle Vision, but Chrysler decided that they’d already missed enough opportunities squandering what little brand identity Eagle had, and killed the name off entirely after a small Read more

Sep 13 2019
3

Isn’t it strange that Cadillac took what was essentially an ATS facelift and decided to change the name to CT4, even though it’s the same car? Read more

Sep 13 2019
2

Same wheelbase, same track as the coupe, same roofline and door apertures. The only thing structurally about the car that has changed from ATS to CT4 is the length of the rear overhang (the literal cheapest thing they could change) and the sheer amount of extra styling they’ve troweled on the outside of it.

Sep 12 2019
1

For 2020, it’ll be in its 8th model year. You may like it, but Cadillac had to kill the ATS sedan off early because very few people actually bought one. You are in a significant minority here. Read more

Sep 12 2019
2

It’s an ATS with a facelift. Same wheelbase and everything. The only thing they changed was adding a bunch to the rear overhang to increase trunk room.