I just want to point out that this is the scientifically correct scale. Anyone who disagrees is objectively wrong

“Switch Joy-Con do a passable Wiimote imitation”

just to be clear we’re all talking about Donkey Kong Country, right?

o k

it competes for flash storage

Nintendo is not a 3rd rate hardware company. Their consoles are thoughtfully engineered and produced reliably - Nintendo used to produce high spec consoles but their business strategy has changed since then

SAD!

how you think supply chain management has anything to do with the power of the console is beyond me

featuring the soundtrack from Mario Galaxy

It’s all sort of meaningless though since demand outweighs supply for not just Switch, but for all recent Nintendo hardware launches

It’s because its one of like 8 games on Switch right now. Early adopters are more likely to buy because there isn’t a lot of competition for their $$$

There are more Switch advantages than just resolution - it has better draw distance for instance

He’s not nearly as progressive he pretends to be, but I feel sort of relieved to have a centrist in power as opposed to Harper (our previous PM) or Trump

ya u r right they should be pushing out GOOD ideas and kneecapping BAD ones they should hire you

Mario Odyssey also looks fab

that *might* make sense for a new product you’re trying to generate PR / hype for, but it makes basically no sense for a product near the end of its lifecycle. More likely, nintendo was conservative with its demand estimates because it they’d rather sell everything than risk taking a bath on unsold inventory

yes, thank you for showing the first chart everyone sees in economics 101; you really proved your point with nuance

This is based on specious reasoning and not actual economic data.

thank god for rich people keeping the economy afloat /s

Take2 has a market cap of $3.8 billion. They could conceivably be sold for less than $5 billion