I don't know. They already have the engine and tons of assets from Ocarina 3D. I'm not claiming this will sell more than maybe a million units, but it seems like a reasonably smart investment. Not many games can sell to the level of a Zelda remake.

boooo

For comparison, the original article points out that a Big Mac in Denmark costs $0.80 (after conversation to USD) more in Denmark than in America. Cost of living is higher and they pay more taxes, but considering they make 250% what the average American fast food worker makes, I'd say that there is no way their wages…

This is more like buying a GBA, then realizing that there are GBA SP exclusive games (there is no such thing, which is the point).

I don't claim to have a solution for these issues, but I think that a push for both sides to quiet down is problematic in its own way. It minimizes discussion, as well as dissent.

Good point!

But can it run Crysis?

I bet it fucking sucks

There are currently 5 seasons, and the fifth is closer to the first three than the fourth in terms of quality

Don't be insensitive. I'm just saying there are a number of reasons (both business & creative) why Nintendo has a hardware strategy. Why not look into it before offering your half-baked ideas?

"I really don't understand why you have to have a Nintendo console when everything they make could easily be on other systems"

I disagree. When your strategy/product offering is less successful than it used to be you need to make changes and come up with new ideas. Find ways to reach the mass market.

for ME?

In terms of newly-announced games, I think Toad's Treasure Tracker is the only major one coming out in 2014.

Any idea which site you read that on? I'm just curious is all. Here is another article & quote:

This is the article I was referring to. He talks about it being 'Link' and 'and extension of the player character', but gender wasn't mentioned. My guess is that gender will remain ambiguous, which wouldn't even be much a departure from past games.

"Turning it on its ear" doesn't necessarily mean removing it, just changing it

They confirmed 'Link', but I don't remember reading that he is confirmed male

You turning this into a Men's Rights issue demonstrates how much privilege you think you are entitled to. Nobody is questioning your sexuality or cares if you're repulsed by some humans but not others, but you feel the need to express these things in an effort to prove that you should be entitled to your entitlements…

Highly doubt it