I knooooww, right?? HORRORS.

My boss has been calling her kids (early elementary age and preschool age) chicken butts and accidentally called me that at work yesterday. Best belly laugh of the year when her face turned red after saying it and explaining it’s her kids favourite joke right now. So now I am a chicken butt too.

I often think back and wish I could be as giddy and laugh as hard at stupid shit as I did as a tween. The way joy bubbles up and over at that age is an amazing thing.

Fascinating, thank you.

Guess what?!?

I learned a new concept recently: “defining deviancy down.” Broadly speaking, I think we are in free fall.

When I was a kid, chicken butt got an average of 30-60 seconds of laughter every time. The kids aren’t high, that’s just how they are naturally.

I’ve taught middle school first 11 years and let me tell you they are little weirdos. They like weird things and say weird things and do weird things. They other day a group of girls was dying of laughter in class because one said she was going to own a store called Taco Shop but they wouldn’t sell tacos. And…

Everything of the past two years has become so beyond the pale that we are running out of descriptors. No combination of words can encapsulate this stream of recombinant insanity.

Giddy is the natural state of any group of 12 year old girls ever.

This brings up a point I think people don't remember - the president is someone hired for a job. It's an important one, but it doesn't require flawlessness or the overall well-roundedness people seem to want. You're not going to marry the president. You are not going to have to live with them forever. Find the…

One of them tried to tell me they “shouldn’t have to read a book” to figure out what her position is. Like they’ve never heard of, you know, websites (even though we already know too well that the MSM conditioned a whole bunch of people not to go to HRC’s to read hers, where her position statements were, ‘cause the…

This, ftw. I don’t think politicians are above criticism. We should call them out for unsavory policy. Yet at the same time it feels like Kamala Harris is the potential nominee being torn apart.

Because there are people who don’t understand how the law works, they don’t know the difference between and an AG and a prosecutor. For example, some people were blaming “Three Strikes” on her. “Three Strikes” was a law enacted by the people of California. The AG, DA’s and Prosecutors, have to follow legislation.…

For me, it would be the Twitter guy. I feel like he’s just a villainous human being, whereas I am not sure that Mark is a human being. 

Just don’t be a racist shithead! It’s not that hard!

Sorry but it amazes me when I hear men say I’ll vote for a woman for president but not this woman, Hillary, or this woman Kamala, or this woman, Gillebrand. Can I ask all the men in this room a question? What woman is good enough for you. There is a difference between nuanced conversation about Harris’ record as a…

You could’ve watched her interview with Rachel last night.

Honestly, it wouldn’t be the worst thing to have a former prosecutor as president. Whoever the 2020 nominee is needs to be able and willing to politically prosecute the fuck out of the current administration.

I’m trying to tune it out. The policy I have going forward is that I will defend any Dem against what I consider purity/litmus testing whether I like them or not. For example the “Kamala is a cop” stuff is just simplistic sloganeering. If one wants to talk about her record great but clearly whoever came up with Kamala…