You used saying “Fox News” as if it were an argument.

One thing National Geographic didn’t do was get sued to death for publishing private details of peoples’ sex lives for lulz.

So far I’m two Trump comments into an article which couldn’t have less to do with Trump.

I just think of all diners as 1950's themed. Not being sarcastic; aren’t they all to some extent?

Absurd. If she had been a real person and diedmbecaisentheynwastednthatntime thinking she was a dummy, you’d be shitting on the cops.

THATS EXACTLY WHAT THEY SHOULD DO! BEFORE TRYING TO SAVE ANYONE, COPS SHOULD FIRST WASTE PRECIOUS TIME TRYING TO FIGURE OUT IF MAYBE THE INJURED PERSON IS A MANNEQUIN. I AM AN INTERNET KNOW IT ALL, AND COPS SUCK!

Yeah I really don’t get how the cops are jerks here. Put yourself in their place; you’d do the same thing.

It’s awesome that this article is about a CPR dummy, and I’ve scrolled down this far to only find this bullshit discussion. Thanks.

So were they ACTUALLY bulldozing graves, or this is a case of the tribe saying “this land is sacred”? Show me evidence that actual graves were bulldozed.

They’re digging up ancestors to cross the river? Show me.

You have a lot of time on your hands. Nothing but comments, comments, comments here. Do you have real life relationships? I hope so.

Your examples are 1 extreme geological oddity with a tiny population (Iceland), a bunch of countries with energy needs in a different universe than the “major industrialized nations” I specifically mentioned (I mean you’re seriously going to throw Bhutan and Lesotho at me as examples and expect me not to laugh?), and…

Your butt feels like its femur is broken.

True or false: the builders of the pipeline were, as part of the agreement, constructing a water intake plant 60 miles upstream from the pipeline, so that there would be an unaffected supply in the worst case scenario?

I don’t claim that they are.

Let me guess, you get to be the arbiter of which people should “do without” and what it is they should “do without”?

Forbidding the market from selling oil is called the free market?

The people responding to me don’t get this or care about it. My point was that they are arguing what our energy infrastructure SHOULD look like at some future point (and the particulars of that itself are very debatable), while the debate over this pipeline should be dealing with reality at this particular moment. I’m…

Ad hominem. Deduct 200 points and return to Oberlin for a semester of Offended Studies.

That fact is kind of pathetic at the moment, but we aren’t far away from SpaceX and the like blowing the doors off of the old government model.