I would also add that just because something is deemed rare, doesn’t mean it adds any value.

The neighborhood I work in is very Filipino, I can’t bear to imagine how bad they drive in the Philippines.

Years ago, I saw on some TV program to make sure that you always had a certain amount of money stuffed in your passport.

Even if you don’t end up buying the car there, it would be a good place to see similar vehicles side by side and compare them directly and I understand that they usually have lots of inventory.

Yes.

Cause you know, gotta support the corporate overlords who move manufacturing away from the unions.

He probably has a completely shit driving record and multiple drivers on the policy.

Or you could lose the AWD and just get a well equipped Accord.

Chevy Cavalier

It all depends. Every store has a different program and if the starting tread was 6/32, at 5/32 it would only be ~20% worn, so you would only have to pay 20% of the replacement price.

Don’t worry, my city is ass backwards and has traffic lights all over the place. Even on the major highways.

If you spend that much on repairs and ‘immediate’ replacements, look for somewhere that has a “free replacement” warranty. Everyone calls it something different, it’s usually a premium option but in your case it would likely be worth it. Many cover repairs, but that’s a question you have to ask where and when you buy…

I could swear I heard something about YouTube algorithms liking videos over 10 minutes.

If you value your privacy, best to just stay off the internet all together.

In the last year to year and a half, maybe 2, YouTube (allegedly) lost some big name advertisers after a couple of “famous” people did stupid stuff. They also failed to keep pace of their monetization protocols and allowed anyone and their dog to be monetized.

Not a patent issue, it’s a trademark issue.

If he had just stuck with the colour scheme he might have been in an arguable position, let alone one that would garner less attention. But he even put the same spots on the domino.

The source of revenue itself isn’t the issue, it’s using someone else’s trademark to create said revenue.

In the Philippines, it’s more an issue of having enough money to bribe the officials to look the other way.

No. The city, insurance body and/or their insurers would have just cut him a check to avoid a trial.