That punch has long since spoiled, as often happens due to the pesky "some people are actually serious" aspect of reality.

Completely wrong generation & name, but correct that the PS2 version was bizarrely censored.

Whether or not it's worthwhile when taken on a case by case basis, it's a sign of a maturing artistic medium of any kind. As a relatively recent one, games are mostly just notable in how quickly they reached that point.

Bakutoushi Patton-Kun, 1988, Famicom Disk System.

Well, assuming they're not being sarcastic/ironic. Non-ironically used, such childish language in any context should always be your first sign that you're in for a frustrating waste of your time with an irrational idiot who's likely as self-absorbed as deeply insecure.

It's your right to continue being a flippant shitbrick, I suppose.

I think you missed the point. Where there's joke, there's fire.

You appear to be literally guilty of what you are speaking out against. It literally, not figuratively, has already occurred several times in this very article's comments. Give it some thought. Not for me or anyone else. For you.

Perception and reality are not necessarily one and the same. Common misconception, especially by the insecure.

Seem familiar? When you look in the mirror, I mean.

Can we please start finally flat-out calling these folks terrorists already? The FBI's definition of domestic terror:

Crash Catchem, Viridian City PD. Coming this fall.

You should probably not be allowed to post if you're so adept at missing points.

Cute sentiment, but that's not arbitrary. I also completely agree, but my feelings about the game aren't actually important in context.

Basic human psychology, mostly, with the deeper impacts on one's psyche increasing as the time in limbo stretches out. Compound that with the fact that it's apparently pretty run down and also that you're surrounded by other people who are slowly going crazy from boredom, and you've pretty much got a recipe for what…

Why not judge games for what they are, and not what they arbitrarily aren't? DK64 was never meant to be "Donkey Kong Country 64", hence why it was called "Donkey Kong 64". It can be anything it wants, at that point. Certainly, Donkey Kong isn't that much like Country, for example. DK64's genre change may not be your…

Exposing single companies won't change ingrained industry woes. Never has. Further, all of these things could happen at "any" game company tomorrow. The point of this article is more to expose and educate people about the current state of the system and what one can expect to find if they're looking to become part of…

Er, no. He likely can easily do that. It's more a matter of if it's worth doing that.

Give people an option to get milk for free, and the majority of those people will not just take the free milk- they'll expect (if not necessarily demand) free milk in the future, which in practice means they just won't buy milk. In…

Sure.

Interesting insight, thanks. Very little out there backs up what you're saying directly, but it certainly sounds believable when putting the bits and pieces together from all the sources that credit it as if it was 50/50 or similar. The skeleton has flesh now, in other words.

I did, and have. Sorry if my means of doing so wasn't up to your standards, Mulberry.