I wrote a comment at Deadsplinter before I noticed this comment. Maybe that was the wrong order.

This is the funniest Emily Alford line I have read: “Being married is very difficult, which is why so many people have to practice multiple times before meeting the person they will eventually die with.”

It’s worth noting that’s It’s partly my fault and the fault of the Kinja system.

Married 33 years, separate bedrooms for the last 18. It gets harder and harder to sleep as you get older. I snore, and my wife has restless leg syndrome, so she’s constantly moving. MUCH easier to sleep separately, and everybody’s happier. We even get suites when traveling so we can sleep apart and get some rest.

I flagged it, but it doesn’t neatly fit into one of the given categories - “factually incorrect and dangerous” isn’t an option.  

Gizmodo and Facebook both suffer from the same problem: they want high quality conversations to occur (because it brings clicks, which potentially bring ad revenue), but they don’t have the resources to moderate the amount of conversations they have to ensure they are quality. Short of emailing the author (or another…

I flagged it as hate speech.

Seconded. That insanity should earn the poster a straight ban. It’s not like other G/O Media sites don’t ban users for inane bullshit reasons (ahem, Jezebel), much less for being factually wrong and dangerous jagoffs.

After reading the piece I came here to the comments to see what life-threatening nonsense the anti-vaxxers would spew forth. I was sad but not surprised to see the first reply, by jeanlucpickerd, is such lying dangerous stuff. We want Facebook to ban false horribly misleading posts, how about doing the same here,…

THANKS! I was looking for them!

Off topic, but a few Deadspin and Splinter refugees are over here doing a thing, and we’d love to see your face! (If it’s confusing, here’s a nice welcome/explainer for you).

Call your Senators, even the red state ones. There is bipartisan support for a war powers resolution (which is....um...to accompany the current one the president is supposed to be following).

I referenced Lizzo here and referenced you here and I want to congratulate you for another year of The Glow Up!

Yes, his flying monkeys are really something too.

Many many thanks. Will it be sometime later a way to login with my Google/Disqus?? Specially the latter... I’m very fond of it and it got mentioned a couple of times in Wired, before it was paywalled.

As someone who has been in the publishing business longer than I’d like to admit, I can offer a few more Do’s and Don’t’s.

It’s confusing, but I think Harry’s last name is Mountbatten-Windsor. They seem a little fast and loose on when that’s actually used though. When he was in the Air Force his nametag said “Harry Wales”.

If you correct their political reporting with evil facts, you get censored quickly. Then you’ll stay like that, which means that your posts are usually being ignored as they seldom bother to “unlock” them. Of course, people leave.

When you factor in the boob physics, hip sway, seductive walk, playful giggles when sneaking, sexually charged moans when taking damage, make-up application animations, entirely new costumes and outfits that all show off midriff/cleavage/thighs, and a host of other problems it’s painfully clear how much extra work…

I recently saw in Private Eye, who tend to be quite good on behind the scenes stuff, that many at the Palace are essentially expecting him to walk away from the Royal life in the near future because of how unhappy Meghan is with the definitely not racist coverage of her which the Palace has largely failed to stop and…