Holland may be right, but she never cited any evidence to support her claim that Majors’ detractors are now his defenders. It’s totally plausible, but I was surprised to see such an omission from an article with the title that she chose.

People don’t like Olivia Munn.

You should watch Léon: The Professional (1994). An 11 year old Natalie Portman goes absolutely off the rails.

While it does seem weird that the first scene she read was a sex scene, I imagine it’s fairly important to gauge actresses’ (and actors’) ability in such scenes if they’re going to be a frequent occurrence for years to come.

Certainly the most accurate kind of right. 

Or if someone non-greyed stars it. I think folks don’t realize that. Once it is out of the greys because of a star, responding doesn’t do anything extra (though I agree we shouldn’t feed the trolls).

The bottle of wine cost $24,500.  $500 in seat reupholstering.  

Story should have made that clear.

and no charges were brought and she has a proven track record of being vindictive throughout the divorce. I don’t see any children’s testimony in the article. Fuck off you filthy misandrist.

She is 100 crazy pussy (albeit the crummy kind)

It gets even odder with her selling her half to a Russian oligarch. I am not about to try and even guess what type of rabbit hole anything a combination of these names would provide.

Why was the FBI involved in a domestic dispute?

So she abused him or he did? I hate these headlines that aren’t very clear.

She chokes him and he literally flings himself away and to you that’s more evidence of him being abusive. Sounds to me like she was the physical aggressor and it’s more likely he was trying to restrain her after to keep her from assaulting him.  And we really shouldn’t judge this case by the Johnny Depp trial because…

Yeah some of these comments are really turning my stomach. Fuck people who prey on children, and fuck people who condone it because “boys like sex hurrr dur dur”

And in all of this, Brigitte Macron is a First Lady…

You should have had Emily Leibert write this one so she could accuse the victim of being someone who was likely to grow into an entitled fuckboy. 

I actually have no doubt that he really was harassing her. She’d completely fucked him up then presumably ended the relationship. A normal 16-year-old would be devastated after being dumped, but a 16-year-old who’d been raped by his teacher for three years?

A Brock Turner sentence. 

I agree with @Roger Chan. I think the disparity in sentencing is likely less about the rapist and more about the sentencer’s perception of damage done to the victim.