Output's placed at 610 horsepower and 612 foot-pounds of torque, weight is listed at 2,976 pounds thanks to a carbon fiber body. Road & Track says that ratio's good enough for a 2.5 second sprint to 62 MPH and a stop speed of more than 210 MPH. Fuel economy's claimed at a reasonable 25.5 MPG on the highway.

The car was the only thing that got me through that episode. I can't believe Seinfeld thinks her character is comedic.

Motocross bikes are designed for that in mind, though. Your normal road car just isn't.

I could definitely see this technique working much better off-road than on-.

I'm sorry, but this is just ridiculous. If you're swerving around something at speed to avoid it but you realize you can't dodge it, you're supposed to Scandi flick the opposite direction just to unload the suspension a bit and hit it anyway? That's absurd.

If you're at full speed with enough time to see the pothole but not enough time to steer around it, how could you possibly time the gas/brake weight transfer well enough (for the front and the back wheel) to do anything about it? I'm just not buying that you can use weight transfer at speed to specifically protect…

The author specifically pointed out that using this technique can "often" prevent component failure (being stuck on the side of the road) from "rocks and potholes". I don't doubt that you can use weight transfer to make speed bumps a bit less jolting at speed, but this doesn't seem to be describing the same scenario…

The author specifically points out "rocks and potholes".

Why not make a sharp turn and avoid hitting the thing altogether? This doesn't make much sense.

You can also use weight transfer to pre-load and unload the suspension over rocks and potholes, often making the difference between being stuck on the side of the road and making it to the finish line (or home).

The only Chevy SS I've seen in person was inside a dealership showroom.

Rough terrain testing? Been there, done that.

I NEED AN AZ-1 IN MY LIFE RIGHT NOW

Manufacturer headquarters count, right? I just need to see some Zondas in person.

Bonus points for the Girl Talk soundtrack.

The vertical lights on the outside are DRLs, no? The circular lights in the mouth thing are fogs.

Although I own Mazdas from 1988 and 2002, my recommendations to friends buying new cars have helped Mazda sell two new Mazda3s over the past few years. :)

Are you kidding? From that exact perspective in the photo you posted, it looks like the face of a bull, with the doors as horns. It's the perfect Lamborghini.

I expect a better design that doesn't have dead spots.

I'm seeing Evo VIII front-end here.