Agreed. It’s clearly very strategic on her part. Endorsing Clinton would anger the supporters of hers who are pro-Bernie, and endorsing Bernie wouldn’t be the right step to take to get in good with a likely HRC administration. It’s a good move.

I can: Bernie votes in support of the legislation. Hillary introduces it. She’s ahead of him on this issue.

Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Oct. 6, 2007: The children’s health program wouldn’t be in existence today if we didn’t have Hillary pushing for it from the other end of Pennsylvania Avenue.

Hillary’s policies go far beyond equal pay. Directly from the article I linked:

He probably also hopes Warren will stop praising Clinton’s economic plan.

Nope, not what I said at all. My view is more that women’s equality is a critical (and, for me, primary) issue that touches all the rest of them. By improving on women’s issues, you improve the country as a whole.

That’s... actually the exact opposite of what she’s saying. She’s saying pushing women’s issues is a key part of economic equality.

...Death eaters? Seriously. Slow your roll, dude. Notice how I didn’t trash talk Sanders? Because I respect both candidates, I just happen to support one more. The vitriol is unnecessary, and only damages your argument.

On paper, Hillary and Bernie may be neck and neck on women’s issues. But I don’t believe he will fight for them the same way she will.

Elizabeth Warren hasn’t endorsed anyone.

I hate myself for knowing this, but one of them actually injured her thumb really early in filming, and had it bandaged. He could tell them apart by that.

I get what you’re saying about the Stockholm Syndrome point, and I don’t think she’s perfect in this episode at all. Honestly, I’m not sure there’s really a way for someone who has never experienced any element of racism to report on it properly.

Ha, I loved the lack of a poker face. But probably because I have the same problem.

I’ve never been a Chelsea Handler fan. My sister loves her, I just don’t get it. But having been snowed in for days on end, I ran out of things to watch, and ended up putting this on last night.

I watched it, and I felt like those questions were more for the benefit of the viewer. I hear people say things like that all. the damn. time. She KNOWS the truth behind it; she’s asking the question to have them point out how stupid it is.

He hasn’t even promised legislation! He’s promised vague ideas with no actual, logical explanation of how they’d be implemented. He has no plans!

...And I’d love to see a bio major dance Swan Lake en pointe without breaking themselves. Your point, it’s lacking.

I’ve heard that before, and I totally appreciate that in its time it would be interpreted that way.

Ugh, I’m so sorry you had to go through that. The Lyme controversy was really my friend’s entire problem, too — she was misdiagnosed so many times that by the time she finally got treatment for Lyme, the disease had progressed so much that she was just incapable of her normal life. Some treatments have worked really…

Words do matter. That’s why I took issue with yours. Again, you are not her doctor. It’s not up to you to question whether or not she’s sick.