I suppose, I just immediately thought “OH overland creators have another game!” and got excited. I am still interested to play this on my switch, it sounds like my jam. 

Any connection between this game and the makers of Overland? The art style seems eerily similar, but a quick google brings up nothing

But this old house is a PBS show, is it not on your local PBS? I don’t understand. :/

This Old House is a PBS show though right?

I second this take. In good bones, Mina makes the decisions, her mom mostly agrees with her decisions, laughs a lot, they have a good time.

I am rolling on the floor laughing at your orthopedists comment. 

When I bought mine (with 210k miles on it), I regularly saw them with 300k+ on them. The K24 is bullet proof afaik. I think it would take significant neglect to break one. 

Andrew Collins was on it with this one. The thing nobody knows about the Element is that it is SO easy to park too. The turning radius is insane, you can completely biff the lead up and recover like a boss and it has big pillow tires, which mean you won’t curb your wheels no matter what. 

You know what happened was, they couldn’t decide between the extra length of a cal king, and the extra width of a regular king, so they asked that girl from the taco commercial.

I mean, it kind depends how you are built and how you sleep... I bet NBA players love them some CA king. 

I am going to give you my very specific perspective on this!

So you don’t know anything about the engines I was using as an example, but you know the Mazda engine is cheaper to make...

Not really getting your point here, yes, some buyers can be tricked into thinking a wagon is a CUV. It doesn’t change the fact that American buyers overwhelmingly choose blob shaped crossovers as their vehicle of choice.

Except I didn’t mention either the F20C or the B18C5.

“And you’re right”

Toyota GT86 makes 200-205hp from 2.0...

You are being goofy now. Trying to discount the plethora of engines that broke 90hp per liter over the last 25 years.

That’s not true though. Take for example a turbo car that has peak torque early, say 200 lb ft at 3000 RPM. It continues to make a bit of torque to red line, but drops off a bit from 200, say down to 161 lb ft at 6500 rpm. 161 x 6500 rpm / 5252 = 200hp

Right, but seeing all the data would be better and you can completely drop torque from the equation. HP at various points would be okay too (1500 RPM, 2500 RPM, 3500 RPM, etc) . Torque is only a useful number when taken into to consideration with RPM, which is exactly what HP is, applied torque.

Duplicate