Exactly. I hate to name-drop, but [Ryan] Fitzpatrick is still playing!?

People who get to the front of the line and still don’t know what they want can go to hell. It’s a fast food place, they only serve but a couple different items. There are massive, brightly-colored menus, with pictures! That you can look at while you are in line.

As a late luncher, it’s not about being too busy, it’s about hating other people.

I am absolutely mystified that people attend something like this. Like, I realize that this takes place in bumfuck wherever, but still. Don’t they have something else more productive to do with their time, like sniff glue?

What dipshits like you don’t understand is how important it is to read the article, and that’s kind of the issue here. You realize that it was a woman who asked the question, right? Here is the transcript:

When Ronda Rousey was undefeated, why weren’t people asking how she would do against Conor McGregor?

Sounds bad but in all honesty, in terms of tennis, she’s an incredibly strong woman but below average for a man.

Look, genital for genital she is the most dominating athlete I’ve ever seen (I also think she’s loaded to the gills on PEDs, but even so, she’s undeniably great), but if she truly were the best of all time, hell if she were just in the top 10 of all players within her era, she would have competed on the men’s circuit.

She would get destroyed by pretty much any man ranked 300 and above. That’s not an insult, it’s just why they separate them. Hell, there are guys ranked near 350 that can serve 160mph. It’s a different sport, Serena’s biggest weapon is her strength and if she played against men it would be a non-factor.

It’s a question designed to give a salacious answer. NPR isn’t known for gotcha journalism (They’re too busy tossing softballs) but here’s an example making their guest look bad by asking a no-win question.

Yeah within that context he seems pretty reasonable. Unless it was a joke I think we should be focusing on Garcia-Navarro’s patently insane claim that Serena Williams is the best tennis player of all time.

She doesnt even need to be forced, she volunteered her opinion on the subject to David Letterman.

He exaggerated on the 700th bit. But isn’t the rest of it true? Can’t we both acknowledge that she’s unprecedentedly awesome and amazing AND that she’d get crushed by someone like Novak D or Andy Murray? She’d presumably admit as much herself if you forced her to answer. Those guys are taller than her, faster than…

Look at how this question was setup:

Is it self-officiated? If we’re going to get all the non-contact injuries of old-man pickup, we should at least get the good parts too.

How can you call a guy soft who wears a headband made of human flesh?

Someone should tell Magic little digs like this is how Phil Jackson started out......

I’m just glad that Lonzo is being set up for success. Managing expectations, giving him time to develop and no pressure what so ever to produce immediate results. This is how a star is born!!!

Saying in no uncertain terms that the players you just traded was not a leader, doesn’t make other players better, and isn’t liked by his teammates is only “not shade” in the sense that the term “shade” isn’t nearly strong enough to accurately illustrate the level of denigration

The entire organization has been inspired by Andy Reid’s tendency to panic and make nonsensical decisions at critical moments.