manicdankinja
ManicDan
manicdankinja

I’ve taken my EV on a few road trips and I stopped for charging almost 0 minutes more than I wanted to stop just to get lunch, coffee or pee. In theory I actually spend less time than if I used an ICE car cause then I would have to stop at the gas station and stand around for those few minutes.

I’m not sure which it more divisive, politics or Tesla?

I know 2 people who bought a 3 and both had Tesla fix panel gaps on a door or two in a post-delivery service, and it was free of charge. Some of it is very possible to fix, stuff like the C-pillar, probably nothing to do there. 

I would be willing to bet that Munro has cost Tesla more than he has earned himself from his stock growth. He praises good engineering from any brand, not just Tesla, and he has definitely called out their bad ideas or quality control repeatedly.

Well now I feel stupid, lol

Our intent with the pilot was to learn about the viability of the subscription model and gauge customer interest

autonomous vehicles figure out some kind of failover system that does not require immediate driver intervention

My Galaxy S9+ seems to hold some serious value. Even after 3 years I cant see some massive jump worthy of the price. And speaking of price, I paid $550 for a new S9+, and there is no hope of a decent flagship phone going for anywhere near that price is there? 

My Galaxy S9+ seems to hold some serious value. Even after 3 years I cant see some massive jump worthy of the price.

GT7 will be when I pick up a PS5, until then its just a dust collector. 

The proper valuation of a company isnt just how much money they are making now, its how much you can expect them to make in the future. Since Tesla is still growing their price is expected to have a higher PE ratio than others, once that growth slows down even a little, their stock price might come tumbling down to

No way to predict if they could ever reach this price again. Which is why I have no plan to jump in if its at $300-$400, to me they are overvalued at anything over $250 until they are done launching products and we get to see how many cars people want annually. For all we know 1m cars per year could be their limit. If

I’m not too interested in PE ratios, I’d rather just look at revenue. They are still way behind, but their growth is pretty solid for now.

Stock valuation in its simplest form is what are you willing to pay, which greatly is affected by what could happen and a little about where they are now. So in 10 years if they really do hit every goal, they still wont be as big as the rest, but then at that point their valuation as a stock would make sense to

They’re being valued like a tech company, except they can’t possibly grow like a tech company due to the realities of manufacturing.

Agreed,

There is absolutely a difference in sound quality between cars. Try listening to a podcast or audible and have the sub try so hard to impress you that everyone’s voice becomes distant sounding and throaty. A simple test is to try and set the podcast volume to match as if you were having a conversation with a passenger.

The image looks like the worlds worst or best drag race depending on how much you like truck racing.

The news was Elon mentioning subscription options.

I was curious about the lighting, good photomodes like in gran turismo and forza use fully path traced lighting and take time to process, and some images above look like they are, and some look like normal in-game lighting and DoF. Is this photomode just taking the current settings and you get the best results by

I just put your trip into “A Better Route Planner”, assuming a Tesla Model 3 Standard Range Plus and it showed that this route is very viable, with only two stops, one 16 minutes and the other 6 minutes.