Barry, you’re only a size 11. While 11 4E may be hard to find, you at least have a somewhat decent shot at finding actual shoes of any kind in stores. Meanwhile, I have not been able to try on a pair of shoes before I buy them since 2001.

Am I the only one that notices the camera follows his head around 0:40 without him touching it and without the car moving? What the hell is that?

Bill Clinton?

LOL

That was SEVEN years ago? I find a new reason to feel old every day.

Where would you say Gordon and Saric rank on the “Butt” spectrum? Are they sub butt?

Aliens, clearly.

Only monsters refrigerate chocolate.

Unless they win a ring or two, they aren’t getting in. IMO. Stanford is youngish so he has time. Rivers does not. He is what he is and he isn’t getting a ring in SD anytime soon. Rivers is one maybe two years from retirement.

If Rivers and Stafford make it, then Romo is a shoe in. Check the numbers. They aren’t making it.

Forgot about Roethlesberger. My bad. Clearly he is up there with the rest. My apologies to Steelers nation.

Different era, imo, in that he started in the 90s. A distinction without difference maybe but I see Peyton as the preceding era. Clearly getting in.

I agree, but the HOF voters will not, unfortunately.

“Does Romo have a Hall of Fame case?”

GOOD DOGS

Yes. This makes me doubt Germain actually watched the show. It showed her look at the pill, think about the pill, and the finally take the pill. It was not a quick flash moment.

I forgot for a moment where this is the internet and, after reading a wikipedia article (haha yeah right. More like skimmed the introduction), you are now well versed in the doctrine of reasonable doubt. Notice how most of that article has no citations? And how there is a warning pointing that out? And how in…

I’m a licensed attorney....

Hopefully that’s what he was saying. But in my experience, juries all to often convict or acquit based on whether they believe the guy did it.

Not sorry, but I think you’re missing the point in that you took my comment as doubting the verdict of the jury when it was a comment on juries in general and the attitude that what he believes is what truly matters. Hence “side rant time.”