Did they prove that he “knew” that it had been reported as child abuse beyond a reasonable doubt? I don’t know. My point is the jury could and should acquit in every criminal case in this country even if they believe the defendants is guilty IF the state has not proved he knew beyond a reasonable doubt. In other…

Side rant time. I take this as an admission that he believes “prove beyond a reasonable doubt” to mean “persuade me that he did it.” He can believe the guy did it without the burden being met by the state. The standard for acquittal should not be “do I think he did it” but that is effectively what it is in this…

I should not have laughed at this. And yet hear I am cackling like an idiot. Take your star you son of a bitch.

If I’m at a bar that doesn’t serve food, I’m going to be to drunk to care what’s sticking anyways.

That makes every game taxing like a road game though.

Yeah, it does. It’s like you people don’t understand the difference between a fortune teller and a statistical model.

False. More like 45 min to an hour and then you just add more salt.

So you’re saying I’m in a good spot for learning arabic at present.

I have mini persian carpets. Big fan of those.

Yes, all of this.

100% accurate.

Meant no offense. Just agreeing with you. Overreaction and not being able to hear tone and cadence in comments is why the internet is a shithole, imo.

I can still see the beginning of it in the link address to your comment. Good move.

Bar napkins work just fine as a coaster and not the fancy ones with the ridges. Just sprinkle some salt on the napkin and your beer won’t stick to it.

That was clearly a Ken M-esque comment.

There’s no need to hide Ken M’s name with green highlight...

I came, I saw, I croutoned.

Smoked dry rubbed baby pigmy hippo....oh man. Sounds good.

Kinja’d

The Homie will pick up the slack.