m4nt3
m4nt3
m4nt3

10/10 comment

Sweet jesus. At this point, it doesn’t even have to be progressive as defined. The only reason they would have to NOT do this is willful disregarding of evidence in the name of ideology.

It saves money. It keeps away all the low income babies they love to make sure are born and then refuse to help. It reduces the

“For not delivering product placement that was paid for”
FTFY

...and what, the 15A fuse on my cigarette lighter just chills out because it knows I’m jumping my car?

...and what, the 15A fuse on my cigarette lighter just chills out because it knows I’m jumping my car?

Your beliefs lead to the preventable death of children, yeah. The authorities tend to step in. This isn’t rocket surgery.

I dunno, if they legit make a car , with some of the talented industrial designers they scoop up, the results could be fairly impressive.

Consider a 1500W curling iron, which is pretty low end. Say it runs on 12V, to keep it simple. To run for a quarter hour. That’s 1500W*.25 hours, or 375 Watt hours. This is without the fan, which also pulls power. Just the heater. With the battery tech you are talking about, this laptop battery,

While it’s gross, it’s also pretty inevitable, and I’m having trouble mustering outrage. Facial Recognition like this has been mainstream for a while, they just mated it to a public image crawler, which people have talked about doing (or have been actively doing, depending on who you talk to) for a decade. Yeah, it’s

That prefacing word is a major alteration to the meaning.

He is literally cleaving metal robots in half with his shield blows.

Maybe in Europe. Not in the US. At least, not on my Visa or my MC.
It’s funny watching all the Europeans chime in to tell us the features of our stuff. Novel.

But other methods of obtaining hydrogen efficiently are actively being explored, developed, and worked on. They just haven’t supplanted the fact that we have a shitload of natural gas available for practically nothing.

Burn the natural gas, capture the carbon onsite, as well as have many sources of hydrogen availible, versus just plug yet another fossil fuel IC engine.

Hooray, my struggles are validated by statistics!

Holy shit, there appears to be TWO different author bylines on these pieces! WHOAAAAAAA

Except the hypersonic shipkillers that came into service almost a decade ago they can’t intercept.

The number aren’t “context”, they change nothing. It has no enhancement to understanding.

......The odds remain 9% , whether there are 100 projects or 100,000,000. You have a very odd view of statistics.