What a delightfully convenient (for you) solution.

Dude, you generate plenty of your own publicity.

It's got nothing on windex.

Consequences will never be the same.

You don't. If you want an entire menagerie of highly educated people oncall to help if you need it, however, you do.

You just have to see it for the grim farce it is and laugh of the absurdity of it. That's all you can do.

I want a Backstreet Boys style dance break with the wedding party to "everybody (backstreets back) at my big, fancy wedding. Me and my girl are working on the dance moves. I feel like my friends are going to fail utterly, though. Thankfully it's some time in the future.

The point in this was perhaps, the chances that you were misreading the situation, versus 100 some people misreading it and all reaching the exact same conclusion, was improbable.

I'm totally a dude, brochacho.

...and I'm fully aware of the legal rights surrounding marriage. Looking into it soon, myself.

I'm sure there are grown-up child brides that could make the exact same statement.

Dude. I'm not angry at all. I just am passionate and say fuck a lot.

Again, you are drawing a boundary in the relationship, which is fucking fine. What is not fine is a rule with the implied subtext that you are in charge of his actions. He may know those actions would result in the termination of the relationship,…

The exact phrasing is ""He's very territorial, and since he no longer lets me do videos with men"

This is important. It implies HE decides what she does. Right there. This entire debacle is about phrasing, but it is the phrasing that is very telling.

It wasn't a request. It wasn't a boundary. He decides what videos she…

He can leave. She can leave! Anyone can leave. At any time! For anything!
No one is arguing that.

You can be angry. You can break off the relationship!
Just like if you got her pregnant, she could go get an abortion against your wishes! Because it's her body, not yours.

Just like if you were feeling frisky, and she totally wasn't, and you forced her to have sex with you, it would be rape! Because it's her body, not…

Dude, do you live on earth? All kinds of harmful shit happens all the time.

You are just missing me all over the place.

EVERYONE, I think, except for some outliers, would feel discomfort with sexy gyrations and dancing of their spouse. I completely agree, we are on the same page.

Yes, I judge insecure, possessive people of all gender expressions as shitty.... WHEN THE CONSEQUENCE IS HARMFUL TO OTHERS.

"that he would ever let touch her"
There it is again. She's not his property. Her body is her own.

Yes. both are opinions that claim "Whatever we do in our relationship is our business! It doesn't hurt anyone!", only these examples are easier to show how problematic opinions have effects greater than just in a nuclear unit.... and yes, in this case, the implication that he can dictate, not suggest, not "keep…

>innocent until proven guilty
This isn't a court of law. I can assume whatever I damn well please. In a zero information situation, all conclusions are valid.

Why do you keepname dropping him like a fanboy? It doesn't matter.

Again, we can find his sexual desires to be shitty. Ideas do not have rights. I can criticize…